Abstract

Democratic engagement has entered a new phase with the advent of the internet. Citizens can now freely offer their opinions and critiques and advocate for political mobilization. Even governments have recognized the benefit of the internet for democracy. However, the internet can be used as a tool of surveillance & venue for censorship & prosecution of sedition. The offense of sedition, as a relic of colonial rule, persists in several democracies, in spite of the numerous critiques & growing discontent with the state of civil liberties and freedom of speech. The growing prominence of sedition laws in relation to the internet remains grave, considering most governments apply such laws to dissent, social media activism, and to target journalists and political opponents. In this context, this paper examines the interplay between sedition law and digital freedom in democracies, with a primary focus on India and comparative examples of other democracies. This research examines the evolution of the right to free speech and sedition jurisprudence as well as the impact of digital communication on how the state may regulate expression. The extent and reach of sedition laws can lead to a chilling effect and a rational fear of offending the law can result in the curtailing of free speech. This research also examines the role of the judiciary in achieving a fair equilibrium between the protection of the civil liberties of citizens in the digital realm & protection of the state.

Keywords