Home / Volume 9, Issue 3 / The Reservation Policy in India: A Necessary Tool… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 9 Issue 3 333 - 347 May 18, 2026

The Reservation Policy in India: A Necessary Tool or Hindrance to Merit Based Growth

Lead author · Corresponding
Kaviya S
Student at Sastra Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Co-author
Avanthika Udaya Malar MS
Student at Sastra Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract

Reservation has remained one of the most debated and sensitive socio-legal issues in India. While a significant section of society considers reservation an essential mechanism for ensuring social justice and equality, others argue that it adversely affects meritocracy and fair competition in educational institutions and public employment. The reservation system in India was introduced with the objective of uplifting historically disadvantaged and socially marginalized communities, particularly the Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs), who were subjected to centuries of discrimination and exclusion. Over time, the policy has expanded to include Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), thereby widening the scope of affirmative action within the constitutional framework of India. This research paper critically examines whether reservation continues to function as a necessary tool for social upliftment or whether it has become a hindrance to merit-based growth in contemporary India. The study analyses the historical development of reservation policies, constitutional provisions, landmark judicial decisions, and the socio-economic factors that influence the implementation of reservations in education, public employment, and political representation. It further evaluates the arguments both in favour of and against the reservation system, focusing on issues such as equality of opportunity, representation, social justice, efficiency, and meritocracy. The paper also explores the impact of reservation policies on merit lists, competitive examinations, government employment, and promotions in public services. In addition, a comparative analysis with affirmative action policies followed in countries such as the United States and Canada has been undertaken to understand how different nations address social inequalities while balancing merit-based selection. The research adopts a doctrinal and analytical method by relying on constitutional provisions, case laws, government reports, journal articles, and secondary sources. The study concludes that although reservation has played a crucial role in improving representation and reducing historical inequalities, reforms and periodic review mechanisms are necessary to ensure that the system remains fair, balanced, and consistent with the principles of equality and merit in a democratic society.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 3, Page 333 - 347
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us