VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessCase CommentVol. 6 No. III (2023)pp. 2087–2093

The Animal Welfare Board of India v. Union of India on Jallikattu and Kambala

RS
Ranjana SathiavageeswaranAdvocate in India
View PDF
1,248views714downloads
Published 1 June 2023 · pp. 2087–2093 · Vol. 6 No. III (2023)
Abstract

Indian jurisprudence on animal rights is a huge point of contention and debate. The use of animals in various sports for entertainment, accompanied by cruel and inhumane treatment, triggered this debate. Liberal interpretation by the Supreme Court in the A. Nagaraja judgment, banning Jallikattu, Kambala, and Bull Race for being cruel to animals, resulted in utter chaos with pressure forcing States to amend them. These Amendments were challenged for being a mere cosmetic change of law to override the earlier judgment. This Article is a detailed comment on the judgment that ensued.

Keywords
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act1960animal crueltyJallikattuKambalaAmendments

How to cite

Ranjana Sathiavageeswaran, The Animal Welfare Board of India v. Union of India on Jallikattu and Kambala, 6 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 2087 (2023).

Cite this article

Ranjana Sathiavageeswaran, The Animal Welfare Board of India v. Union of India on Jallikattu and Kambala, 6 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 2087 (2023).
Chat with us