Health is universally acknowledged not just as freedom from illness but as a state of overall physical, mental, and social well-being. The entitlement to the highest attainable standard of health is affirmed as one of the core humans right by international instruments as well as by constitutional frameworks of several countries. In this regard, the World Health Organization (WHO), as the leading authority in global public health, bears the responsibility of coordinating international action to safeguard and promote health across nations. Each Member State of the United Nations (UN) have accordingly established their own healthcare infrastructure and delivery mechanisms with the objective of fulfilling this fundamental right for its citizens. Nevertheless, the sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic brought to light the stark deficiencies, inadequacies, and inequities in healthcare systems not only in developing nations like India but also in many developed parts of the world. The pandemic severely tested the resilience of medical infrastructure, highlighted the limitations of resource allocation, and raised pressing ethical, legal, and policy questions regarding access to healthcare and medical facilities. Beyond the health sector, COVID-19 also disrupted the socio-economic fabric of societies globally, accentuating vulnerabilities of marginalized communities and creating new challenges in governance, social justice, and human rights protection. In India, the pandemic highlighted critical concerns regarding the constitutional and legal position of the right to health under Article 21, judicial interpretations, and the extent to which state mechanisms could ensure equitable access to medical services. This research paper closely examines these constitutional and legal dimensions of the right to health and medical care in India during the pandemic, with particular emphasis on the gaps that were exposed and the lessons learned. Further, it also evaluates the effectiveness and limitation of the World Health Organization (WHO), and its accountability in responding to one of the gravest global health emergencies in modern times. By integrating legal, constitutional, and institutional perspectives, the paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of the right to health in emergencies and to suggest ways for strengthening global and national healthcare governance in the post-pandemic world.
