Assistant Professor at VES College of Law, Chembur, Mumbai., India
Building resilience in the face of an increasing number of disasters is essential to sustainable development. The complex dynamics, approaches, and difficulties of incorporating disaster management within frameworks for sustainable development are examined in this abstract. Global environmental sustainability, economic advancement, and social stability are all at risk from disasters, whether they are caused by nature or by human activity. A comprehensive strategy that integrates proactive actions like mitigation, readiness, response, and recovery within larger sustainable development paradigms is necessary for effective disaster management. Important tactics include encouraging multi-sectoral collaboration, encouraging risk-aware decision-making, encouraging community engagement, and utilizing technology advancements for early warning systems and quick reactions. Development agendas that incorporate resilience strengthen society's ability to adapt and reduce vulnerabilities in the future. The importance of implementing a comprehensive and inclusive approach to catastrophe management within frameworks for sustainable development is emphasized in this study. Communities can achieve sustainable development goals while strengthening their ability to withstand setbacks by doing this. In order to strengthen global resilience in an increasingly unpredictable environment, policymakers, practitioners, and academics should pay more attention to these tactics, difficulties, and useful suggestions in this study.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 1, Page 1345 - 1357
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118623This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021