Home / Volume 8, Issue 4 / Cross-Border Insolvency: An Indian Paradigm Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 8 Issue 4 1040 - 1054 July 26, 2025

Cross-Border Insolvency: An Indian Paradigm

Lead author · Corresponding
Sagar
Research Scholar at Amity Law School, India
Co-author
Priyanshi Shukla
LLM Student at University of Allahabad, India
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110520
Abstract

The world is a global village with corporation no longer bound to their “native” to do business. But risk remains an intrinsic factor of all businesses and there are several that fail, in their wake they might stop their operations but leave their debts behind. In early industrial era, such debts were dealt on a national level. However, in the era of globalization, such solutions are no longer feasible. Today, countries are struggling with balancing the interest of nations with corporations to stay ahead in the economic race. Insolvency is a sensitive matter for both the corporation and the state which has to facilitate such process but within the globalized world there is a need for globalized insolvency process. On an international level, an endeavour in the form of UNICITRAL Model Law has been made which multiple nations have accepted, other nations have made relevant changes to their domestic laws to facilitate ‘cross-border’ insolvency but India stays on the backfoot with such changes. While Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 provides for provisions that may facilitate cross-border insolvency, these provisions have yet to see real application. Stakeholders and research groups have come up with solutions with Insolvency Law Committee seeking implementation of ‘Draft Part Z’ but all of this remains theoretical. This paper examines the concept of ‘Cross-border Insolvency’ in light of governing judicial and administrative principles and draws a comparative analysis to accurately identify India’s stance on the issue along with potential suggestions.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 4, Page 1040 - 1054
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110520
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation