Abstract

This research paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of Article 32 and Article 226 of the Indian Constitution, which deal with the power of the judiciary to issue writs. The paper will examine the scope and applicability of these provisions, as well as their differences and similarities. The paper will begin by providing an introduction to Article 32 and Article 226, and will discuss the thoughts of the constituent assembly on these provisions. It will then proceed to examine the key differences between the two provisions, including their scope, applicability, and binding effect. The paper will also discuss the various types of writs that can be issued under Article 32 and Article 226, and will examine some important case laws that have dealt with the interpretation and application of these provisions. In addition, the paper will discuss the role of the judiciary in enforcing fundamental rights through these provisions, and will examine the importance of ensuring that citizens have access to an effective remedy against violations of their rights. Overall, this research paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of Article 32 and Article 226 of the Indian Constitution, and to highlight their importance in safeguarding the rights of Indian citizens.

Keywords