VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessCase CommentVol. 4 No. IV (2021)pp. 2275–2278

Case Commentary on Hari Shankar V. Rao Girdhari Lal Chowdhury (AIR 1963 SC 698)

GN
Gadkari Sharvari NihalStudent at Symbiosis Law School, Pune, India
View PDF
1,638views940downloads
Published 3 August 2021 · pp. 2275–2278 · Vol. 4 No. IV (2021)
Abstract

The case comment discusses the judgement given in the case of Hari Shankar v. Rao Girdhari Lal Chowdhury and further analyses Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure mainly stating about the inaccuracy in the High Court’s revision and also deliberates upon which powers are conferred upon the Court under revisionary jurisdiction by evaluating the Supreme Court's decision in the present case. Moreover, the piece recognises the latest position of law by examining Law Commission’s Reports. Lastly, the case comment provides suggestions in regard to the provision of revision for the betterment and efficient functioning of the judicial system.

Keywords
RevisionAppealRemedyEvidenceJustice

How to cite

Gadkari Sharvari Nihal, Case Commentary on Hari Shankar V. Rao Girdhari Lal Chowdhury (AIR 1963 SC 698), 4 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 2275 (2021).

Cite this article

Gadkari Sharvari Nihal, Case Commentary on Hari Shankar V. Rao Girdhari Lal Chowdhury (AIR 1963 SC 698), 4 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 2275 (2021).
Chat with us