Home / Volume 7, Issue 4 / A Case for Dignity in the Constitution of… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Volume 7 Issue 4 1697 - 1709 August 19, 2024

A Case for Dignity in the Constitution of Mauritius

Lead author · Corresponding
Ayesha Jeewa
Student at Open University of Mauritius
Co-author
Dr. J.N. Milan Meetarbhan
Supervisor at Open University of Mauritius
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118185
Abstract

Mauritius has a unique hybrid legal system which has evolved from the French and the English legal systems. On 12 March 1968, Mauritius acceded to Independence and was “granted” a Westminster Independence Constitution, drawn up in Whitehall, London . Apart from a few minor amendments no in-depth review of the Constitution has been undertaken. Thus Mauritius still applies its 1968 Independence Constitution in 2024, despite major changes in its economy, societal build of its population. It is more and more felt that features considered as cornerstones of constitutionalism are missing. The present article will endeavour to highlight how the 1968 Independence Constitution of Mauritius can still be applied comprehensively to present day situations by reference to human dignity. While human dignity is specifically mentioned in the Constitution of South Africa such is not the case in the Constitution of India and yet the Supreme Court of India has delivered landmark judgments on human dignity.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 4, Page 1697 - 1709
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118185
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation