VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessArticleVol. 3 No. III (2020)pp. 1480–1486

Parashuram D.S. v. The Tata Industries Bank (AIR 1928 PC 180)

SB
Sana Banyalstudent at Symbiosis Law School, Noida
View PDF
6views0downloads
Published 3 July 2020 · pp. 1480–1486 · Vol. 3 No. III (2020)
Abstract

This case was filed as an appeal (No. 91 of 1926) against the judgment of High Court of Judicature at Bombay, confirming a decree of the same High Court (Pratt, J.), on its Original Side, dismissing the suit of the Plaintiffs. The case was presented before a three-Judge bench comprising of Lord Shaw, Blanesburgh and Salvesen. The case was decided on the 8th May 1928. The alternate citation for the present matter is AIR 1928 PC 180.

Keywords
Case commentPrivy CouncilBanking lawNegotiable instrumentsAppealBombay High Court

How to cite

Sana Banyal, Parashuram D.S. v. The Tata Industries Bank (AIR 1928 PC 180), 3 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 1480 (2020).

Cite this article

Sana Banyal, Parashuram D.S. v. The Tata Industries Bank (AIR 1928 PC 180), 3 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 1480 (2020).
Chat with us