Home / Volume 8, Issue 3 / The Effects of Corruption on Good Governance in… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 8 Issue 3 2069 - 2088 June 9, 2025

The Effects of Corruption on Good Governance in Afghanistan: Lessons for Fragile States

Lead author · Corresponding
Aramuddin Timory
Research Scholar at Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India
Co-author
Shaiwal Satyarthi
Professor at Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India
Abstract

This conceptual paper explores the impact of Corruption on good governance in Afghanistan, with a specific focus on the judicial sector. Furthermore, the author used secondary data sourced from international organisations such as the World Bank, United Nations (UN), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), as well as from peer-reviewed academic journals. This study aims to evaluate how Corruption affects judicial performance in Afghanistan and draw lessons from fragile and neighbouring Asian states. The findings reveal that Corruption undermines institutional trust, weakens judicial independence, discourages investment, and exacerbates social inequality. Theoretical perspectives from scholars such as Lambsdorff and Mauro emphasise the negative correlation between Corruption and economic development, highlighting its role in diminishing the quality of public service delivery. Case studies from post-conflict countries such as Sierra Leone, Liberia, Kenya, and Rwanda underscore the significance of transparent judicial appointments, strong anti-corruption enforcement, and sustained capacity building. Similarly, regional experiences from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Iran, and Sri Lanka offer practical insights into judicial activism, civil society engagement, and transitional justice. Moreover, the study found the Afghan judiciary one of the most corrupt public institutions, characterised by political interference, inadequate infrastructure, and the prevalence of informal justice systems. The paper concludes that effective judicial reform in Afghanistan requires a context-sensitive, multi-stakeholder approach—combining political will, international cooperation, institutional restructuring, ethical training, and public engagement. By drawing on global best practices, Afghanistan can work toward building a transparent, independent judiciary that enhances public trust, strengthens the rule of Law, and contributes to long-term governance and stability.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 3, Page 2069 - 2088
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us