Home / Volume 7, Issue 6 / Uniform Civil Code vs Un-Uniform Society: UCC a… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 7 Issue 6 2410 - 2419 December 30, 2024

Uniform Civil Code vs Un-Uniform Society: UCC a Key to Abolish Inequality & Polygamy

Lead author · Corresponding
Kowsalya K.
Student at Government Law College, Dharmapuri (Affiliated To TNDALU), India
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118869
Abstract

Our Indian laws are rooted in the sources called customs and usage, which means a group of people follows a certain set of traditional practices and usages for a long period of time. By using this, personal laws were derived. Personal laws mean the laws of individuals in matters relating to marriage, divorce, adoption, succession, inheritance, guardianship, etc. Every individual in this society follows a certain set of rules and regulations for their marriage based on their personal laws, which leads to polygamy and child marriage. This kind of practice shows that the society is functioning in a non-uniform way. Personal laws are highly discriminatory towards society, so to remove this kind of discrimination, a Uniform Civil Code is needed. UCC is defined under Article 44 of the Indian Constitution. In simple words, UCC means ONE NATION, ONE SOCIETY, ONE LAW. A Uniform Civil Code will be a key to abolishing discrimination, polygamy, child marriage, etc.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 6, Page 2410 - 2419
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118869
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation