Home / Volume 4, Issue 3 / Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 and Rohingya Refugee Crisis:… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 4 Issue 3 507 - 517 May 8, 2021

Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 and Rohingya Refugee Crisis: A Critical Analysis

Lead author · Corresponding
Supriya Mehta
Student at Alliance University, India
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.11529
Abstract

Rohingya Refugee crisis is a major humanitarian crisis faced by international society and is a matter of concern for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The Rohingya Muslims had been facing discrimination and violence for a long time. On 25 August 2017, the military attacked the Rakhine state of Myanmar to execute the Rohingya Muslims staying there. Approximately 7,45,000 Rohingya Muslims fled from the Rakhine state in Myanmar. The Myanmar government refused to acknowledge the presence of Rohingyas in the Rakhine state. The policies made by the Buddhist majority country were against Rohingyas, as they feared that Rohingya Muslims want the country to be a Muslim majority country. The Rohingyas constitute approximately 7% of the total population, Buddhists 80% and other ethnic minorities 13%. The Rohingyas are denied their citizenship by the government, eventually making them ‘stateless’. This paper traces the timeline of discrimination faced by Rohingyas as it dates back to 1948. Further, it analyses the role of India and the approach taken by the Indian government and judiciary for tackling this crisis. Although India is not a party or signatory of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 and the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees 1967, it provides asylum to several refugees. Domestic legislation and policies have been formulated keeping in mind the refugees hosted by India. The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) 2019 is considered to be against International Human Rights, and it limits the definition of ‘refugee’ as defined in the 1951 Convention.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 4, Issue 3, Page 507 - 517
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.11529
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation