The AI Renaissance in Intellectual Property Law: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Implications and Regulatory Challenges with Proposed Solutions for AI Driven Innovations

Intellectual property (IP) law has traditionally relied on human ingenuity invention and creativity and nevertheless the rapid development of AI technology has severely shaken these doctrinal underpinnings and these days AI systems can do much more than just act as passive tools and they can come up with creative works new technical solutions and financially viable outputs entirely on their own with very little human input and questions of authorship, invention and responsibility have become more complex as a result of this change and the effects of AI driven innovation on copyright, patent and trademark systems are examined in depth and compared in this article and with a focus on seminal cases like Thaler v. Vidal and Ankit Sahni v. Union of India it analyses the reactions of courts in important countries including the India, the US, the UK and the EU and the study points out major gaps in regulation and doctrinal consistency such as a lack of universally accepted standards confusion over who is the author or inventor and unanswered questions about responsibility and the use of training data. This paper presents a series of practical reforms based on current legal literature and case law and these reforms include hybrid authorship models changes to legislation to acknowledge innovation enabled by AI and the creation of global regulatory frameworks and intellectual property law it says must change to accommodate AI driven creativity if it is to continue fulfilling its original purposes of encouraging innovation and safeguarding individual rights.