VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessCase CommentVol. 4 No. III (2021)pp. 677–682

Tata Consultancy Service Limited V Cyrus Investment Private Limited & Ors

View PDF
3,537views1,360downloads
Published 11 May 2021 · pp. 677–682 · Vol. 4 No. III (2021)
Abstract

Recently, Supreme Court gave a landmark judgement in a battle that started in October 2016 between TATA group and its chairman Mr. Cyrus This case Tata Consultancy Service Limited V. Cyrus Investments Private Limited, and Others highlighted the doctrine of “Oppression and Management” under Section 241,242 and 244 of The Companies Act, 2013. This case commentary encapsulates the facts, issue and judgement of the case under which the validity of dismissal of Chairman of TATA group, Mr. Cyrus Mistry and the decision taken by NCLAT in favour of Mr. Mistry was challenged.

Keywords
oppressionMismanagementPrejudicialTata GroupCyrus Mistry.

How to cite

Bhavya Khatreja & Nandini Hooda, Tata Consultancy Service Limited V Cyrus Investment Private Limited & Ors, 4 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 677 (2021).

Cite this article

Bhavya Khatreja & Nandini Hooda, Tata Consultancy Service Limited V Cyrus Investment Private Limited & Ors, 4 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 677 (2021).
Chat with us