Abstract
Recently, Supreme Court gave a landmark judgement in a battle that started in October 2016 between TATA group and its chairman Mr. Cyrus This case Tata Consultancy Service Limited V. Cyrus Investments Private Limited, and Others highlighted the doctrine of “Oppression and Management” under Section 241,242 and 244 of The Companies Act, 2013. This case commentary encapsulates the facts, issue and judgement of the case under which the validity of dismissal of Chairman of TATA group, Mr. Cyrus Mistry and the decision taken by NCLAT in favour of Mr. Mistry was challenged.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.