Home / Volume 9, Issue 2 / Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Corporate Decision-Making: A Comparative… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 9 Issue 2 4259 - 4276 May 11, 2026

Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Corporate Decision-Making: A Comparative Study of India and Global Frameworks

Lead author · Corresponding
Pratiksha Singh
Student at Amity Law School, Noida, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1112032
Abstract

In today's world, Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a pivotal role in the operations of business firms by making decision-making processes more efficient, reliable, and scalable. By enabling predictive analytics, automation, and big data processing capabilities, AI is becoming an integral part of various corporate functions, such as financial forecasting, human resources management, compliance, and customer profiling. This research paper aims at reviewing the present regulatory framework on AI in corporate decision-making processes, with an emphasis on the legal context in India, while also referring to international regulations, specifically those of the European Union and the United States. Using doctrinal research methodology, the author examines statutory provisions, such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the recently introduced Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, together with various policy documents and judicial decisions to highlight how constitutional principles related to privacy, equality, and proportionality can be used in cases where there are no specific laws regulating AI. Despite some progress in creating an appropriate legal framework, it is found that India still has a number of significant regulatory gaps when it comes to the governance of AI. Most notably, it does not have any legislation specifically dedicated to artificial intelligence issues; moreover, there is no provision for its mandatory application or enforcement in practice. Compared to other international legal frameworks, such as the one created by the European Union, which relies on risk assessment and imposes clear compliance obligations, this may make AI governance in India less structured and more challenging. This research paper concludes that regulatory regimes for AI should ensure both innovation and accountability simultaneously. To achieve this balance in India's context, a combination of binding regulations and ethical principles should be used, along with an appropriate classification of AI systems and their risk assessment.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 2, Page 4259 - 4276
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1112032
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us