Abstract

Policing in India today stands right at crossroad where democratic accountability meets shadows of colonial legacy that still influences its structure and spirit. The present research work tries to explore in detail how different institutional mechanisms, statutory reforms, and oversight frameworks together determine contours of police accountability within Indian legal system. It traces historical origin of Police Act of year 1861, analyses constitutional division of powers under Seventh Schedule, and evaluates how judicial interventions have sought to transform police into more professional and autonomous body. Even though Supreme Court in Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC 1 issued landmark directions for reform, compliance across various States continues to be patchy which clearly reflects deep resistance to structural independence. The research also focuses on persistent human rights violations such as custodial torture and extra-judicial killings as documented in Status of Policing in India Report (SPIR 2025), thereby exposing stark difference between legal prescriptions and ground realities. Drawing guidance from UNODC Handbook on Police Accountability, Oversight and Integrity and USAID 2016 Report on Effectiveness of Police Accountability Mechanisms, this study follows doctrinal and analytical method to compare India’s domestic practices with international standards. The objective is to propose rights-oriented model of democratic policing grounded in transparency, ethical conduct, and active community participation. In end, it concludes that true reform will never flow merely from administrative instructions but only from broader legislative change and deeper cultural transformation within police institutions so that they reflect spirit of constitutional morality and uphold principles of rule of law.

Keywords