Human Rights Impact of Implementing the International Pandemic Agreement: The Case of Mongolia

Some human rights may be limited by law, but they must be justified, necessary and consistent with the norm. This restriction is essential to respect human rights when taking measures during mass epidemics and quarantines, and requires careful consideration of human rights issues when implementing pandemic agreements. When the pandemic agreement is ratified by each State and the measures are contained and it is implemented each member State is obliged to make decisions in accordance with its own domestic legislation (Assembly, 2021). The restriction is intended to ensure the safety of citizens and society, and the imposition of the restriction must be accompanied by respect for Human rights, reasonable treatment and complains with the requirements and fairness. A violation of principles is considered if it does not comply with the purpose of protecting interests or if it deviates from that purpose and takes actions directed against it. New international legal regulations on human rights are necessary internationality due to the fact that the responsibilities and obligations expected during the pandemic are tie; to the internal laws of the countries, and pandemic treaty is still in the negotiating stage, which has not yet been finalized. My research is focused on the critical impact of the pandemic on Human Right Protection and supporting reforms in the legislative process.