VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessResearch PaperVol. 8 No. IV (2025)pp. 1596–1600

From Big ‘C’ to Small ‘c’: How Comparative Constitutional Law Transformed Preventive Detention in Bangladesh

IT
Istiak Kamal TonmoyJunior Associate at Haque and Associates, Bangladesh
View PDF
838views264downloads
Published 12 August 2025 · pp. 1596–1600 · Vol. 8 No. IV (2025)
Abstract

This article talks about how the preventive detention law in Bangladesh was transformed though the impact of comparative constitutional law by relying on the principle of Small ‘c’ constitution. The unlimited and unfettered power of the Government by virtue or article 33 of the Constitution of Bangladesh and the Special Powers Act, 1974 was limited though the landmark case of Mrs. Aruna Sen vs Government of Bangladesh 27 DLR (HCD) 122. Throughout this article the impact of various judicial decisions of foreign countries which allowed the Court to establish that the authority of the Government to exercise the power of preventive detention must ben reasonable and subject to judicial scrutiny has been highlighted. The impact of such foreign judgement is the said impact of Small ‘c’ constitution which transformed the law of preventive detention in Bangladesh.

Keywords
Comparative ConstitutionAruna Sen CaseSmall 'c' ConstitutionPreventive Detention

How to cite

Istiak Kamal Tonmoy, From Big ‘C’ to Small ‘c’: How Comparative Constitutional Law Transformed Preventive Detention in Bangladesh, 8 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 1596 (2025).

Cite this article

Istiak Kamal Tonmoy, From Big ‘C’ to Small ‘c’: How Comparative Constitutional Law Transformed Preventive Detention in Bangladesh, 8 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 1596 (2025).
Chat with us