VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessResearch PaperVol. 4 No. IV (2021)pp. 3882–3885

Case Comment: Re Prashant Bhushan and Anr

AT
Apoorva ThakralAdvocate at ST Law House, India
View PDF
1,430views850downloads
Published 29 August 2021 · pp. 3882–3885 · Vol. 4 No. IV (2021)
Abstract

Constitution of India forms the supreme rule of law. The power to protect the sanctity of it is imposed on the judiciary. That implies, while the judiciary has to ensure the rights and freedom of the citizens by administering justice, it also has to ensure that no external force is influencing its decisions and causing hindrance in such administration of justice. This is why the provisions of contempt of court act are significant.
Herein, the case comment of Re: Prashant Bhusan and Anr, we will discuss the threat that independence of judiciary causes over the citizens' freedom to criticize and vice versa while analysing the affect of media trials and the ambiguity of the contempt laws.

Keywords
Contemptcriticismjudiciarymediajustice

How to cite

Apoorva Thakral, Case Comment: Re Prashant Bhushan and Anr, 4 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 3882 (2021).

Cite this article

Apoorva Thakral, Case Comment: Re Prashant Bhushan and Anr, 4 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 3882 (2021).
Chat with us