INTRODUCTION
The concept of crime is as old as human society and so is the case with the concept of punishment. But as the society grew further, there came about a gradual change in the view of sociologists and social scientists. Now, social scientists have formed an opinion that punishment cannot solve the problem of crime and criminals in a society, because not all criminals are of the same type. Now it came to be generally accepted that all criminals cannot be stopped from violating criminal laws through punishment only. It requires some other ways also. Criminologists and sociologists introduced different methods to improve upon crime and criminal problems. Punishment was to be directed toward correction and reformation so that the criminals may be improved in their behaviour and may again be assimilated into society as its useful members.1 The problem of studying Indian prisons is two-fold: one is that of aligning theoretical and methodological imperatives in the proper perspective of the problem, which in turn depends upon the development and maturity of social science. 2
While it’s true that the conditions in contemporary prisons are an improvement compared to the past, there is still a significant need for reforms to ensure the humane treatment of inmates. Prisoners’ treatment must align with constitutional rights to guarantee their basic entitlements. Highlighting the necessity of changing how jail authorities interact with inmates, the Supreme Court noted that “progressive criminologists worldwide would agree that Gandhi’s perspective of offenders as patients and his view of prisons as therapeutic institutions — whether for mental or moral rehabilitation—is fundamental to understanding delinquency and the rehabilitative purpose of punishment. Every individual is inherently healthy, and each person is born good. Our prisons should serve as centres for correction, not as harsh environments that crush the spirit.”3
PRISON AND PRISON REFORM
Prison: – Over the past three centuries, prisons have transformed into institutions of social control and symbols of legitimate authority. They are no longer merely places within the legal process where outcomes like the death penalty, exile, or life imprisonment may be decided. Instead, prisons are now influenced by prevailing norms and values related to humanitarianism, enlightenment, and the welfare state. They reflect the ideals of their time while also incorporating principles from organisational science. Prisons do not operate autonomously like churches; rather, they function as tools of the state, shaped by their social context as well as the current social, political, and economic conditions.4
Prisoners can be categorized in three manners as under: – Pre-trial prisoners: Pre-trial prisoners are the accused, detained who are under the custody of the state for the purpose of interrogation and investigation based on FIR or evidences found during the investigation. They are in the custody of state for very limited period. Under Trial Prisoners: Under trial prisoners are the prisoners who are in the Judicial custody i.e. jail awaiting the trial in their case. Their charge-sheet may or may not have been prepared by the police authority or judiciary. Convicted Prisoners: Convicted prisoners are the prisoners who are found to be guilty of some particular offence which is committed by him after due process of law. They are punished by the competent court as a penal action to be kept in prison.5
Prison Reform: – Prison reform involves the care and rehabilitation of inmates. Nowadays, prisoners are provided ample opportunities to improve and rehabilitate themselves while serving their time. “Prisons should be changed into hospitals to give treatment to offenders, to bring them onto the correct line. The officer of the jail should be changed into a doctor. The offender shall feel that officers of the jail are their friends.”6
EVOLUTION OF PRISON REFORM IN INDIA
The prison system in India traces its origins to colonial enactments such as the Prisons Act, 1894 and the Prisoners Act, 1900, which were primarily oriented towards maintaining discipline and deterrence, with little emphasis on reformation. During the British period, prisons functioned largely as coercive institutions aimed at controlling offenders rather than rehabilitating them. A gradual shift in this outlook began with the Indian Jail Committee of 1919, which acknowledged the importance of treating prisons as centres for reform. In the post-independence era, this reformative philosophy gained further momentum, particularly through the contributions of Walter C. Reckless, whose report on jail administration recommended professional training for prison staff and the establishment of after-care services to facilitate reintegration of prisoners into society. These recommendations were later endorsed in the 1952 Conference of Inspectors General of Prisons, which also called for revision of prison manuals and a shift towards correctional administration. Subsequent committees, including the Mulla Committee and the Krishna Iyer Committee, played a crucial role in shaping modern prison reform policies by emphasising humane treatment, rehabilitation, and the protection of prisoners’ rights. The need for greater uniformity in prison laws and administration was underscored by the Supreme Court in Ramamurthy v. State of Karnataka7, which highlighted systemic issues such as overcrowding and lack of infrastructure. This led to the formulation of the Model Prison Manual, 2003, later revised as the Model Prison Manual, 2016, incorporating progressive provisions relating to legal aid, parole, furlough, and repatriation of prisoners. More recently, the Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023 has been introduced to replace outdated colonial laws with a modern, correctional-oriented framework. However, as prisons remain a state subject, the adoption and implementation of these reforms vary significantly across states, resulting in inconsistencies in prison administration and the protection of prisoners’ rights across the country.8
A. Reformation & Rehabilitation Activities
The concept of imprisonment has evolved considerably from its earlier punitive nature to a more humane and reform-oriented approach. In the past, prisons were associated with harsh physical labour such as breaking stones or grinding chakki, reflecting a system focused mainly on punishment and deterrence. However, in modern times, the philosophy of imprisonment has shifted towards reformation and rehabilitation of offenders. Prisons are now regarded as correctional institutions where inmates are provided opportunities to transform their behaviour and reintegrate into society. Emphasis is placed on educational and vocational training programs that help prisoners acquire knowledge and skills for a better future. Alongside this, counselling, psychological support, and activities like yoga, meditation, and cultural programs contribute to their mental and emotional well-being. Initiatives such as open prisons, parole, and aftercare services further assist in preparing inmates for life after release. Overall, the present system recognises that imprisonment should not merely punish but should aim to reform individuals, reduce reoffending, and enable them to become responsible members of society. There are some reformative activities as described as follows:
• Facilities provided in the Jail: Some activities for prisoners are recreation, sports, yoga, meditation, adult education, library, computer learning facility, vocational training, embroidery and swing, etc. In the female ward, educational classes are also held.
• Treatment of the offenders: Yoga and meditation programmes held by various voluntary organisations. Creative art therapy, which is psychotherapeutic in nature, is used in several settings. It helps to express, channelize and ventilate oneself.9
• Factories in Jails: Generally, nowadays there are many factories in the jails, i.e., weaving, carpentry, chemical (soap, oil, etc.), paper, tailoring, bakery, etc. This helps the person to rehabilitate after release from jail, after the completion of the sentence. There has been 100% growth in the turnover of the Tihar Jail factory within last 2 years.
• Grant remission, commutation, pardon, etc: The rehabilitation and reformation of the offender is not the sole responsibility of the judiciary. The Legislature and Executive also have to play their respective roles. The Legislature can contribute to the rehabilitation and reformation of the offender by enacting suitable legislation dealing with the subject. It must be noted that for the ultimate success of the rehabilitative and reformative needs, suitable legislation is the ultimate recourse.10
• Release the Prisoner on Furlough and Open Prison: In modern practice, furlough and parole remain crucial processes for temporary release in the Indian prison system, but their implementation has become more organised, regulated, and focused on rights. While both aim to promote rehabilitation, there is now a clearer distinction between them: parole is typically granted for urgent or specific situations, such as family emergencies, while furlough is a regular release designed to help inmates maintain social connections and support their rehabilitation even when there is no pressing need. The Supreme Court of India has emphasised that these releases should not be seen merely as discretionary benefits, but rather as aspects of a prisoner’s legal rights that ensure humane treatment and reintegration into society. Recently, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a more systematic and broader application of these measures to alleviate prison overcrowding and address humanitarian issues. Nonetheless, the regulations concerning the duration, eligibility, and frequency of furlough and parole still differ among States, indicating the lack of a uniform national policy. Open prisons, often referred to as open-air camps or open jails, are important facilities for the rehabilitation of offenders. These modern institutions aim to reintegrate prisoners into society through a robust aftercare program. Instead of confining inmates within prison walls, they engage them in productive work such as forestry, agriculture, and construction. This approach is vital for the reform process, which should be a key aspect of rehabilitation management. In India, the first open prison was established in 1905 in the Bombay presidency, but it was closed in 1910. It wasn’t until 1953 that Uttar Pradesh set up the first functioning open prison in the country.11
PRISONERS’ RIGHTS AND THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION
The Constitution of India provides equality for each and every person before the law or equal protection of law within the territory of India. A prisoner is also Guaranteed certain rights and every prisoner should be treated as a person. The court in India, including the Supreme Court, has recognised the basic right of prisoners. The Supreme Court has held that “there could be several factors that lead a prisoner to commit a crime, but a prisoner is required to be treated as a human being entitled to all the basic human rights, human dignity and human empathy.”12 In the case of State of A. P vs. Challa Rama Krishna Reddy and others13 the Supreme Court held that the prisoner is entitled to all his fundamental rights unless his liberty has been constitutionally curtailed
The guarantee of human dignity forms part of our constitution in the form of articles 14, 19 and 21. The preamble sets the human tone and temper of the founding documents and highlights justice, equality and the dignity of the individual. Articles 14 interdict arbitrary treatment, discriminatory dealing and capricious cruelty. Article 21 is the embodiment of a wide range of human rights in a single sentences-no person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. Article 21 serves as a refuge for human dignity, mandating fair procedures and prohibiting cruel, punitive, or unjust treatment. This Article has become a perennial source of human law. The fair procedure and dignity are guaranteed to each prisoner.14
The judiciary has recognised several rights and protection to the prisoners, such as-
• Right to free legal aid
• Right to speedy trial
• Right against handcuffing
• Right against inhuman treatment
• Right against custodial violence
• Right to claim damage
The first right that flows from fairness is the provision of free legal services to a prisoner who is indigent or otherwise disabled from securing legal assistance. List of cases started from Hussainara v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar15, Khatari v. State of Bihar16, Sukdas v. UT Arunachal Pradesh17 and M.H. Haskot v. State of Maharashtra18. The court laid down the law of free legal aid to every poor accused person who cannot afford counsel.19 It may sound contradictory to use two terms, prison and freedom, simultaneously, but in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration20 Supreme Court held that the prisoners are not wholly denuded of their fundamental rights; they are entitled to all the constitutional rights unless their liberty has been constitutionally curtailed. Though a prisoner’s liberty is in the very nature of the thing circumscribed by the very fact of his confinement, his interest in the limited liberty left to him is all the more important. In Charles Shobraj v. Superintendent Central Jail21, Tihar, New Delhi, the Supreme Court recognised that the right to life is more than mere animal existence or vegetable substance. Even a Prisoner is required to be treated with dignity, and one enjoys all the rights specified in Article 21.22
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PRISONERS
Human rights are the basic rights vested in every human being, which are essential in every civilised society and enable them to live a dignified life. The concept of human rights often loses its meaning and importance in the context of persons who have committed a wrong and are sentenced to imprisonment. They are called prisoners. We can’t deny him basic human rights as a person being a prisoner does not cease to be a human being. Although our constitution provides ample provisions in the preamble, fundamental rights and directive principles securing equal justice and dignity to individual but still prisoner administration of prisons in India is still far from being satisfactory. The paper attempts to examine the status and enforcement of human rights of prisoners by the Indian judiciary.
Internationally, human rights have been affirmed by the UN charter to promote and encourage respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms of all. The objective of the UN charter is achieved by the international bill of human rights, which included universal declaration for human rights, 1948, the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, 1966, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, etc. Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stated that no one shall be subjected to torture or the cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 10 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights reads.23
PRISON LAWS IN INDIA
In India, prisons are primarily administered by state governments, as per Entry 4, List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the States have the power to legislate and regulate prison administration. The legal framework governing prisons and prisoners in India includes the following:24
• Prisons Act, 1894
• The Prisoners Act, 1900
• The Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920
• The Constitution of India, 1950
• The Transfer of Prisoners Act, 1950
• The Representation of the People Act, 1951
• The Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955
• The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
• The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987
• The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993
• The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
• The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017
• The Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003
• Model Prison Manual, 2016
• Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023
JUDICIAL APPROACH
The Indian Judicial system has played a significant role in the direction of prisoners and also to ensure the safety and security of the people in custody or inmates, as follows, with the help of deciding Case Laws:
• Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration25, The Apex Court affirmed that prisoners are entitled to all fundamental rights that are compatible with their incarceration. Highlighting the importance of humane treatment and the protection of basic human rights for prisoners, the Supreme Court stated in Sunil Batra II (1983) 3 SCC 488: “Fundamental rights do not vanish when a person enters prison, although they may be limited due to incarceration.”
• D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal26 It was determined that the authorities must inform a friend or family member of the accused right away upon arrest. The rationale is straightforward: this notification allows the accused loved ones to begin gathering information about the situation, secure legal counsel, prepare a defence against a remand application, and arrange for bail as needed.
• Rudal Shah v. State of Bihar27 It was held that, if the trial against a prisoner concludes in acquittal, the prisoner is entitled as a matter of right to be released forthwith. After an order of acquittal, he cannot be detained behind bars.
• Sanjay Suri v. Delhi Administration28 The Apex Court held that the prison authorities should change their attitude towards prison inmates and protect their human rights for the sake of humanity.
• Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra29 The Supreme Court addressed complaints about violence against women in prison. It ruled that these victims should get legal help paid for by the state and be protected from abuse. The court also said that talking to the prisoners is important to get the right information, but this access needs to be controlled..
• Dharambir v. State of U.P30 The court directed the state government to allow family members to visit the prisoners and for the prisoners at least once a year, to visit their families under guarded conditions.
• Re Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisoners case, the Counsel for the Petitioner filed before the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution to address the status of Prison reforms in India and to issue directions, if necessary, for prison reforms. The Prisoners are no less human than others and therefore must be treated with dignity. The Supreme Court of India recently, on March 14, 2016, delivered a landmark judgment which regard to the legal and constitutional rights of prisoners in India, especially the under-trial prisoners. In compliance with the court’s directions, the Model Prison Manual 2016 provides for the establishment of under trial review committee consisting of the Secretary, the district service legal authority, along with the district judge, as chairperson, the district magistrate and the district superintendent of police.
• K.K. Saxena v. Union of India31 in this case, the Supreme Court dealt with the treatment of prisoners and their rights, particularly focusing on issues of overcrowding and inadequate facilities. The Court emphasised that the right to live with dignity extends to all prisoners, regardless of caste. This ruling underscored the need for systemic reforms in prison administration to ensure that all inmates are treated humanely.
• Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana32 In this case, the harsh treatment of prisoners due to their caste was highlighted. The Supreme Court mandated an investigation into the occurrences of violence and discrimination based on caste within prisons, emphasizing that any kind of discrimination is unconstitutional. The ruling underscored the importance of accountability within the prison system and urged the establishment of strategies to eliminate caste-based segregation.
• Prashant Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh:33 The Supreme Court addressed the rights of prisoners during the COVID-19 pandemic, recognising that vulnerable populations, including those from marginalised castes, faced heightened risks. The Court ordered the release of certain categories of prisoners to decongest jails, emphasising that every individual has the right to health and safety, which is particularly crucial in the context of systemic inequalities.
• Sanjay Kumar v. State of Bihar34 In this case, the Court examined the conditions of prisoners and the impact of caste-based discrimination. The judgment highlighted that caste-based segregation within prisons constitutes a violation of the rights to equality and dignity. The Court mandated that prisons adopt measures to ensure fair treatment of all inmates and ordered the state to provide adequate facilities, reflecting the principle that the penal system should aim at rehabilitation rather than discrimination.35
CHALLENGES IN THE INDIAN PRISON SYSTEM
Overcrowding remains one of the most pressing challenges in Indian prisons, placing immense strain on available resources and severely limiting the scope for effective rehabilitation of inmates. A significant contributor to this issue is the high proportion of under-trial prisoners, many of whom remain incarcerated for prolonged periods due to delays in the judicial process. The persistent pendency of cases in courts further aggravates the problem, resulting in the denial of timely justice. In addition, the shortage of prison staff hampers proper supervision, security, and the overall well-being of prisoners. Women inmates face distinct difficulties, including inadequate hygiene facilities and vulnerability to custodial abuse. Instances of physical and psychological torture continue to raise serious human rights concerns, reflecting gaps in accountability and oversight mechanisms. Overcrowded conditions also facilitate the spread of infectious diseases, posing risks to both inmates and prison authorities. Furthermore, the continued reliance on outdated, colonial-era prison laws highlights the urgent need for legal reform to align prison administration with contemporary human rights standards.36
CONCLUSION
The transformation of the Indian prison system indicates a significant transition from a purely punitive approach to one that emphasizes reform and the protection of rights. Imprisonment is a crucial part of the criminal justice framework, but it can no longer be justified solely by the need for deterrence or punishment. The Indian Constitution, especially through Articles 14, 19, and 21, ensures that prisoners retain their fundamental rights and are treated with dignity and fairness. Judicial intervention has been vital in strengthening these protections and creating a more progressive prison administration framework. However, the current state of prisons in India still faces serious issues like overcrowding, poor infrastructure, custodial violence, and inconsistent enforcement of reform initiatives across different states. These challenges reveal the disparity between constitutional ideals and actual practices. As a result, there is a pressing need for standardised prison laws, effective application of reformative strategies, and increased accountability in prison management. The focus of the penal system should shift from mere punishment to rehabilitation. Measures such as open prisons, parole, furlough, vocational training, and psychological support should be enhanced to help reintegrate prisoners into society. Additionally, societal perceptions of former prisoners need to change to foster their acceptance and reintegration. Ultimately, adopting a humane and constitutional perspective in prison management is not only a legal requirement but also demonstrates the values of a civilised society. True justice is found not in harsh punishments but in the system’s ability to rehabilitate individuals and enable their return as responsible members of the community.
*****
Footnotes
1. Devendra Chandra, Open Air Prisons (A Sociological Study), 17 (Vohra Publishers and distributors, University Road, Allahabad, 1984).
2. Indra J.Singh, Indian Prison: A Sociological Enquiry, 5 (Concept Publishing Company, Delhi, 1979).
3. Mohammad Giasuddin vs State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1977 SC 1926.
4. Supra note 2 at 1.
5. Rishabh Bhargava, “A Critical Study of Prison Reforms in India” 2 Pen Acclaims 4 (2018).
6. Malik & Rawal, Law & Social Transformation in India, 450 (Allahabad Law Agency, Faridabad, Haryana, 2014).
7. AIR 1997 SC 1739.
8. Report on Prisons in India, Mapping Prison Manuals and Measures for Reformation and Decongestion by Centre for Research and planning, Supreme Court of India, 2024.
9. N.V. Pranajape, Criminology and Penology with Victimology, 514 (Central Law Publications, 107, Darbhanga Castle, Allahabad 2014).
10. Id at 458-462.
11. Supra note 5 at 11.
12. W.P (C) NO. 406 Of 2013.
13. (2000) 5 SCC 712.
14. Narender Kumar, Constitutional Law of India, 339 (Allahabad Law Agency, Faridabad, Haryana 2011).
15. 1979 AIR 1369.1979 SCR (3) 532.
16. (1981) 1 SCC 627.
17. (1986) 2 SCC 401.
18. AIR 1978 SC 1548; (1978) 3 SCC 544.
19. Ibid.
20. (1978) 4 SCC 409.
21. AIR 1978 SC 1514; (1978) 4 SCC 104.
22. Virender Negi and Monika Negi, “Human Rights of Prisoners – Role of Judiciary” 49 Civil & Military Law Journal 10 (2013).
23. Ibid.
24. Supra note 5 at 7-8.
25. AIR 1978 SC1675.
26. 50 AIR 1997 SC 610.
27. 1983 AIR 1086.
28. (1988) Cr LJ 705 (SC).
29. AIR 1983 SC 378.
30. (2010) 5 SCC 344.
31. (2018) 1 SCC 288.
32. (2019) 12 SCC 34.
33. (2020) 7 SCC 665.
34. (2021) 6 SCC 123.
35. Supra note 6 at 463-464.
36. Prison Reforms – Prison System in India, Laws, Acts, Challenges, Recommendations and More, available at: https://testbook.com/ias-preparation/prison-reforms (last visited on April 24, 2026).