Abstract

In India, the construction industry is a significant contributor to the country’s economy, employing a large workforce and playing a crucial role in infrastructure development. It is also an industry that is highly multifaceted and oppressed with disputes. Complex construction can likewise often result in complex disputes, which predominantly, arise from intricacy and magnitude of the work, multiple prime contracting parties, poorly prepared contract documents, inadequate planning, financial issues and communication problems. These disputes demand a composed and informed approach to resolution. There are two widely known procedures of conflict resolution, namely, litigation and arbitration. There is still the classic approach to taking cases to court, although this has gradually been overshadowed by arbitration which guarantees a speedy resolution. Therefore, a lawyer who is in the process of preparing a dispute resolution clause in a construction contract is constantly in a dilemma. This paper titled “Balancing the scales: Comparing arbitration and litigation in the Indian Construction Conflicts” provides a comparative investigation of these mechanisms, evaluating them on the basis of cost, time efficiency, technical expertise, and confidentiality. This paper concludes with recommendations on optimizing the choice between traditional litigation and arbitration.

Keywords