VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessResearch PaperVol. 7 No. III (2024)pp. 2803–2809

Analyzing Supreme Court on Reservation: Janhit Abhiyan vs Union of India [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1

RP
Robin PrasadAdvocate at High Court of Gujarat, India
View PDF
806views468downloads
Published 13 June 2024 · pp. 2803–2809 · Vol. 7 No. III (2024)
Abstract

The Supreme Court of India revisited the earlier held precedents on reservation while adjudicating the constitutional validity of Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019. The Court upheld that the Economically Weaker Section reservation granted through the Amendment by a 3-2 verdict, to be true to the spirit of Indian Polity and cannot be termed as violative of basic structure of the Constitution of India. The minority dissenting opinion authored by the Chief Justice and one of his brother Justice also provide much insight into the underlying tensions within the concept of reservation and has made reservation for social justice to be a concept vulnerable to judicial review.

Keywords
Constitution (103rd Amendment) Act2019affirmative actionsocial justice

How to cite

Robin Prasad, Analyzing Supreme Court on Reservation: Janhit Abhiyan vs Union of India [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1, 7 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 2803 (2024).

Cite this article

Robin Prasad, Analyzing Supreme Court on Reservation: Janhit Abhiyan vs Union of India [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1, 7 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 2803 (2024).
Chat with us