Home / Volume 8, Issue 4 / Kings and Dharma: Leadership Archetypes from the Rigveda Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 8 Issue 4 2180 - 2200 August 24, 2025

Kings and Dharma: Leadership Archetypes from the Rigveda

Lead author · Corresponding
Shruti Goyal
Research Scholar at BK School of Professional and Management Studies, India
Co-author
Margie Parikh
Professor at BK School of Professional and Management Studies, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110652
Abstract

This research paper explores the leadership archetypes found in the Rigveda, one of the oldest Indo-Aryan texts, through the lens of dharma (righteous duty) and its relationship to kingship. It delves into how early Vedic society conceptualized ideal rulers—not only as wielders of temporal power but as moral exemplars entrusted with upholding cosmic and social order. Drawing from primary hymns, the study identifies and analyzes four key archetypes: the warrior-king, the righteous judge, the visionary unifier, and the ritual upholder. Each archetype is situated within its textual and historical context and is examined for its relevance to both Vedic society and contemporary leadership theories. Through thematic analysis of selected Rigvedic hymns and references to prominent kings such as Sudas, Divodasa, Bharata, and Nahusha, the paper traces how leadership was legitimized through divine association, ritual performance, and ethical conduct. Special emphasis is placed on the interplay between human action and divine sanction, as seen in the roles of gods like Indra and Agni in reinforcing political authority. Furthermore, the study draws parallels between Rigvedic leadership traits—such as bravery, wisdom, generosity, and sacrifice—and modern leadership frameworks, including transformational and ethical leadership. While recognizing the cultural and temporal distance between Vedic and modern contexts, the paper argues that the ethical core of Rigvedic leadership remains relevant in shaping contemporary Indian thought on governance and institutional responsibility. It concludes by suggesting avenues for further comparative research with texts like the Mahabharata and the Arthashastra to deepen our understanding of Indian leadership traditions.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 4, Page 2180 - 2200
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110652
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation