Home / Volume 7, Issue 6 / Comparative Study on the Protection of Personal Dignity… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Volume 7 Issue 6 778 - 794 November 22, 2024

Comparative Study on the Protection of Personal Dignity in Tanzania Mainland: Focusing on the Need of the Right of being Forgotten

Lead author · Corresponding
John Jumanne James
LL.M. Student at University of Iringa, Iringa, Tanzania
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118529
Abstract

Human memory's intricacy can also be linked to the "Internet of things." Human life has been seen and documented by the developing digital realm throughout its history. The peril of the digital past is a current concern for internet users worldwide because of the internet's vast accessibility and perpetual memory. The idea that everything should be remembered but nothing should be erased has sparked a contemporary discussion about the "Right to be Forgotten" (RTBF) in digital space. As a result, RTBF gives a person the ability to manage who can access his information on the internet. However, the laws that have just been passed in India have very little control over information and data, and the RTBF concept is still foreign. The RTBF's importance in Indian domestic law is thus hypothesized in this study. The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate the need for and implications of acknowledging these social forgetfulness rights in cyberspace.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 6, Page 778 - 794
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118529
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation