Home / Volume 5, Issue 6 / Sociological Jurisprudence of Roscoe Pound Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Volume 5 Issue 6 1251 - 1254 December 12, 2022

Sociological Jurisprudence of Roscoe Pound

Lead author · Corresponding
Vinay Kumar Singh
Research Scholar in India
Abstract

Gering's social utilitarianism links Bentham's individual utilitarianism with two important 20th-century movements: the "jurisprudence of interests" in Germany and Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Gering wrote in The Spirit of Roman Law that a legal right is a protected interest. This led him to search for the purpose of law and conclude that every rule of law has a practical purpose. Every job is important. While he believed the human will was free from mechanical causality, he concluded that it is subject to the law of purpose, or that it acts for "reasons" (interests). His arrangement revolves around his interests. Rudolf Stammler attacked economic and historical determinism in his philosophy. He wanted to coordinate various phenomena under one overarching theory, a formal method for determining empirical rule contents. Stamler focused on ethics and law rather than legal rule administration. Under his plan, the jurist faces two problems: authority and the rule of law, and implementing legislation effectively. The state must study social phenomena to achieve just law. Stammler's greatest achievement is functional sociology. He made justice-through-law the social ideal. Stammler studied a community of free-willed men, while Kant studied individuals. He envisioned social cooperation in which individuals merge into communities. He arrived at justice by emphasising individual goals over personal desires. He wanted to replace individualism with a social philosophy of law and add just rule making and adjudication. The sociological jurist should agree fully.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 5, Issue 6, Page 1251 - 1254
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us