VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessResearch PaperVol. 5 No. V (2022)pp. 1288–1293

Drawing the Line: Comparison of the Public Health (Prevention, Control & Management of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism & Disasters) Bill, 2017 with the Health Law in the United Kingdom

AJ
Arshia Ann JoyStudent at The National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi, India
View PDF
1,135views646downloads
Published 24 October 2022 · pp. 1288–1293 · Vol. 5 No. V (2022)
Abstract

The Public Health (Prevention, Control, and Management of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism & Disasters) Bill, 2017 was drafted with an aim to manage epidemics and public health concerns in an effective manner. It entrusted with the executive many sweeping powers without providing adequate safeguards. Although legislation of this kind is novel to the Indian scenario, similar legislation have already been enacted in different parts of the globe. This article is an attempt to compare the provisions of the impugned bill with those in the United Kingdom. The Public Health Bill, 2017 (India) is compared with the Public Health Control of Disease Act, 1984 (UK), the Civil Contingencies Act, 2004, and the recent Coronavirus Act, 2020. The aspect of Bioterrorism, although significant, is beyond the scope of this article and hence not elaborated upon.

Keywords
Health LawPublic Health Bill 2017

How to cite

Arshia Ann Joy, Drawing the Line: Comparison of the Public Health (Prevention, Control & Management of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism & Disasters) Bill, 2017 with the Health Law in the United Kingdom, 5 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 1288 (2022).

Cite this article

Arshia Ann Joy, Drawing the Line: Comparison of the Public Health (Prevention, Control & Management of Epidemics, Bio-Terrorism & Disasters) Bill, 2017 with the Health Law in the United Kingdom, 5 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 1288 (2022).
Chat with us