Home / Volume 8, Issue 3 / Use of Artificial Intelligence in Adjudication for Probation Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 8 Issue 3 2820 - 2832 June 13, 2025

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Adjudication for Probation

Lead author · Corresponding
Dr. Basant Singh
Assistant Professor at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab, India
Co-author
Ms. Purnima Prabhakar
Assistant Professor of Law at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110178
Abstract

The conversation around artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal sector has gradually moved from academic speculation to practical deployment. With courts across jurisdictions increasingly relying on digital tools to manage caseloads, improve access, and ensure efficiency, the question is no longer whether AI will shape the justice system, but how? As technology evolves, it is expected to supplement judicial functions, albeit under careful human supervision. India, while conservative in adopting AI in adjudicatory roles, is taking decisive steps through legal reform and pilot initiatives. Among the areas ripe for such integration is the domain of probation. Probation is a reformative legal mechanism that permits courts to release certain categories of offenders under supervision instead of awarding custodial sentences. It strikes a balance between the punitive and rehabilitative aims of criminal justice, especially for first- time or low- risk offenders. With the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) , procedural law has evolved to emphasise fairness, evidence-based sentencing, and socio- personal context in judicial decisions. These developments create adjudicators in probation assessments. This paper explores the potential role of AI in adjudicating probation decisions in India, critically examining whether its inclusion can serve the interests of justice or merely substitute one form of bias with another. It also evaluates the compatibility of AI systems with the normative goals of probation, particularly in a country where socio- economic disparities and underdeveloped forensic infrastructure continue to shape judicial outcomes.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 3, Page 2820 - 2832
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110178
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us