Home / Volume 8, Issue 3 / The Transplantation of Humans Act 1994: A Critical… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 8 Issue 3 2579 - 2594 June 12, 2025

The Transplantation of Humans Act 1994: A Critical Review

Lead author · Corresponding
Aryan Klaita
Student at Law College Dehradun, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Co-author
Dr. Anil Kumar Dixit
Assistant Professor at Law College Dehradun, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110192
Abstract

The legislation called the Transplantation of Human Organ Act (THO) was passed in India in 1994 to streamline organ donation and transplantation activities. Broadly, the act accepted brain death as a form of death and made the sale of organs punishable offence. With the acceptance of brain death, it became possible to not only undertake kidney transplantations but also start other solid organ transplants like liver, heart, lungs, and pancreas. Despite the THO legislation, organ commerce and kidney scandals are regularly reported in the Indian media. In most instances, the implementation of the law has been flawed and more often than once its provisions have been abused. Parallel to the living related and unrelated donation program, the deceased donation program has slowly evolved in a few states. In approximately one-third of all liver transplants, the organs have come from the deceased donor program as have all the hearts and pancreas transplants. In these states, a few hospitals along with committed NGOs have kept the momentum of the deceased donor program. The MOHAN Foundation (NGO based in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh) has facilitated 400 of the 1,300 deceased organ transplants performed in the country over the last 14 years. To overcome organ shortage, developed countries are re-looking at the ethics of unrelated programs and there seems to be a move towards making this an acceptable legal alternative. The supply of deceased donors in these countries has peaked and there has been no further increase over the last few years. India is currently having a deceased donation rate of 0.05 to 0.08 per million population. We need to find a solution on how we can utilise the potentially large pool of trauma-related brain deaths for organ donation. This year in the state of Tamil Nadu, the Government has passed seven special orders. These orders are expected to streamline the activity of deceased donors and help increase their numbers. Recently, on July 30, 2008, the Government brought in a few new amendments as a Gazette with the purpose of putting a stop to organ commerce. The ethics of commerce in organ donation and transplant tourism has been widely criticised by international bodies. The legal and ethical principles that we follow universally with organ donation and transplantation are also important for the future as these may be used to resolve our conflicts related to emerging sciences such as cloning, tissue engineering, and stem cells.

Keywords The legislation called the Transplantation of Human Organ Act (THO) was passed in India in 1994 to streamline organ donation and transplantation activities. Broadly the act accepted brain death as a form of death and made the sale of organs punishable offence. With the acceptance of brain death it became possible to not only undertake kidney transplantations but also start other solid organ transplants like liver heart lungs and pancreas. Despite the THO legislation organ commerce and kidney scandals are regularly reported in the Indian media. In most instances the implementation of the law has been flawed and more often than once its provisions have been abused. Parallel to the living related and unrelated donation program the deceased donation program has slowly evolved in a few states. In approximately one-third of all liver transplants the organs have come from the deceased donor program as have all the hearts and pancreas transplants. In these states a few hospitals along with committed NGOs have kept the momentum of the deceased donor program. The MOHAN Foundation (NGO based in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh) has facilitated 400 of the 1 300 deceased organ transplants performed in the country over the last 14 years. To overcome organ shortage developed countries are re-looking at the ethics of unrelated programs and there seems to be a move towards making this an acceptable legal alternative. The supply of deceased donors in these countries has peaked and there has been no further increase over the last few years. India is currently having a deceased donation rate of 0.05 to 0.08 per million population. We need to find a solution on how we can utilise the potentially large pool of trauma-related brain deaths for organ donation. This year in the state of Tamil Nadu the Government has passed seven special orders. These orders are expected to streamline the activity of deceased donors and help increase their numbers. Recently on July 30 2008 the Government brought in a few new amendments as a Gazette with the purpose of putting a stop to organ commerce. The ethics of commerce in organ donation and transplant tourism has been widely criticised by international bodies. The legal and ethical principles that we follow universally with organ donation and transplantation are also important for the future as these may be used to resolve our conflicts related to emerging sciences such as cloning tissue engineering and stem cells.
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 3, Page 2579 - 2594
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110192
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us