Home / Volume 5, Issue 5 / The Paradox of Public Interest Litigation as the… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 5 Issue 5 1373 - 1378 October 25, 2022

The Paradox of Public Interest Litigation as the Ultimate Cannon of Law

Lead author · Corresponding
Anna Biju
Student at His Highness Maharajas Govt. Law College, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
Co-author
Lakshmi S Panicker
Student at His Highness Maharajas Govt. Law College, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.113712
Abstract

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plays an important role in the civil justice system as it can achieve goals that could hardly be achieved through traditional private litigation. For example, PIL offers a ladder to justice for disadvantaged sections of society, provides an avenue for enforcement of diffuse or collective rights, and enables civil society to not only spread awareness about human rights but also involve them in government decision-making. This article will show that PIL can achieve these important goals with reference to the Indian experience. However, the Indian PIL experience shows us that it is critical to ensure that PIL does not become a facade to serve private interests, settle political scores or gain easy publicity. Therefore, the challenge for states is to strike a balance between allowing legitimate public interest cases and discouraging frivolous ones.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 5, Issue 5, Page 1373 - 1378
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.113712
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation