Abstract

The proliferation of emojis in digital communication has introduced new challenges for legal interpretation, particularly in the context of Indian law, where case law on this subject is still underdeveloped. Emojis, which convey non-verbal cues and emotions, are inherently subjective and can be interpreted differently depending on context, platform, and cultural background. This paper examines the complexities associated with interpreting emojis in legal contexts, especially in criminal and contract disputes, where clarity of intent is critical. It explores international case law, including Taylor v. Twitter (2020) and U.S. v. Christensen (2017), to highlight how courts in other jurisdictions have addressed these challenges, offering valuable insights for Indian courts. Additionally, the paper underscores the role of expert testimony in helping courts navigate the complexities of emoji interpretation, from linguistic analysis to platform-specific variations in emoji rendering. The Unicode Consortium’s role in standardizing emojis across platforms is also explored, as well as the growing need for formal guidelines to regulate their use in legal documents and professional settings. As India’s legal system grapples with these emerging issues, this research advocates for the development of a more robust legal framework to ensure consistent interpretation of emojis in legal disputes. By examining international precedents and the role of expert testimony, the paper suggests that Indian courts can adopt a contextual approach to emoji interpretation, ensuring clarity and fairness in digital communication-related cases.

Keywords