Home / Volume 9, Issue 2 / The Innocent Intermediary Problem: Corporate Criminal Liability in… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 9 Issue 2 2676 - 2686 April 28, 2026

The Innocent Intermediary Problem: Corporate Criminal Liability in Multi-Tier Service Chains

Lead author · Corresponding
Nguyen Duc Quang Anh
Director at Nextour International Travel & Trading JSC, Hanoi, Vietnam
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1111830
Abstract

The multi-tier visa service ecosystem that has emerged alongside global travel comprises two legally distinct tiers: authorised application centres operated under delegated consular mandate, and travel agency intermediaries acting under contractual authorisation from the individual applicant. This article focuses on the latter, whose legal position has received little systematic treatment in the corporate criminal liability literature. When organised irregular-migration networks route fraudulent applications through such agencies—which occupy purely structural positions in the service chain and perform only formal document verification—criminal investigations routinely extend to the agencies, raising a core question: how should fault be attributed to a legal person whose structural role is formal rather than substantive? This article identifies the phenomenon as the innocent intermediary problem. Drawing on doctrinal analysis and scenario-based modelling, it develops a two-axis analytical framework combining a tiered duty of due diligence (formal, red-flag, and substantive verification) with a three-tier classification of fault (professional risk, organisational shortcoming, and corporate complicity). The framework is applied to a scenario modelled on recurring industry practice in Vietnam and then to Vietnamese law. The analysis shows that the enumerated-offence approach of Article 76 of the 2015 Penal Code, combined with the absence of a front-end screening mechanism in Chapter XXIX of the 2015 Criminal Procedure Code, produces a procedural paradox: legal persons without substantive fault can nonetheless be drawn into criminal proceedings in ways that generate compliance and reputational costs disproportionate to their actual role. Two targeted recommendations are proposed: statutory recognition of the tiered duty of due diligence for service intermediaries, and the introduction of a preliminary screening mechanism for legal persons at the investigation stage.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 2, Page 2676 - 2686
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1111830
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us