Home / Volume 8, Issue 1 / SARFAESI vs. IBC: Analyzing the Intersection of Secured… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 8 Issue 1 657 - 667 January 31, 2025

SARFAESI vs. IBC: Analyzing the Intersection of Secured Creditors’ Rights and the Moratorium

Lead author · Corresponding
Jaya Tayal
Student at Christ (Deemed to Be University), Pune Lavasa Campus, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118890
Abstract

From enforcement of two major structures SARFAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act) and IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code), currently, the scenario in the Indian Banking Sector has changed a lot, specifically in the legal arena concerning insolvency and debt recovery in India. Both tools are of ordeal importance in the field of NPAs and corporate defaults, that work on different principles and processes which often put secured creditors in conflicting situations. While SARFAESI empowers the financial creditor for a speedy recovery of dues by way of enforcement of security interests, IBC, offers a formalized, timebound resolution process for corporate debtors with a moratorium under which creditor actions are stayed. This paper tends to delve into the intersection between such regimes with special reference to how the moratorium under IBC impinges on the rights of secured creditors with reference to SARFAESI proceedings.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 1, Page 657 - 667
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118890
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us