Abstract

Maintenance laws in India were originally designed to provide financial support to dependent spouses, especially women, following marital separation or divorce. These laws, encompassing both personal and secular statutes, aim to prevent economic hardship but have faced increasing criticism due to evolving societal norms and gender dynamics. As women gain greater financial independence, the assumption that only wives need maintenance is being questioned, with concerns raised about gender bias in their application. The legal framework often places an undue financial burden on men, leading to prolonged litigation, economic distress, and mental health consequences. This paper examines the current legal landscape of maintenance laws, focusing on gender imbalances, judicial approaches, and the challenges both spouses face in matrimonial disputes. Although maintenance provisions are gender-neutral in language, their implementation typically favors women, ignoring instances where husbands may also need support. The paper calls for reforms such as gender-neutral maintenance laws, income-based assessments, time-bound orders, and recognition of pre-nuptial agreements to ensure a more balanced and equitable approach, promoting financial security for both spouses while reducing misuse of maintenance claims.

Keywords