Abstract

In a world where the dead tweet, sing, and speak anew through machines, legal systems remain largely silent. This paper interrogates the growing disjunction between the persistence of digital identity and the absence of posthumous rights in law. Drawing upon foundational theories of personhood by Locke, Floridi, and Turkle, it conceptualizes the digital afterlife not as speculative fiction but as a tangible extension of the self, one encoded in memory, metadata, and machine learning. Through an interdisciplinary review of legal doctrines, jurisdictional gaps, and high-profile case studies, including AI-synthesized voices and interactive memorial avatars, the paper exposes the inadequacy of current privacy, contract, and inheritance frameworks. It argues that what endures online is not merely data, but dignity. In response, the paper proposes a normative solution: the Digital Personality Property (DPP) framework, which treats the informational identity of the deceased as both ethically significant and legally protectable. The central claim is clear our digital selves do not die with us, and it is time the law caught up.

Keywords