Student at Faculty of Law, University of Lucknow, India
The effectiveness of medical and legal responses in rape cases in India continues to be gravely compromised due to systemic flaws, outdated practices, and institutional apathy. The two-finger test and other outdated practices continue to be used in defiance of court orders, undermining both Supreme Court decisions and the dignity of victims. Examining seminal examples like as the rape cases of Nirbhaya, RG Kar, and Hathras exposes pervasive flaws in medical procedures, prompt evidence gathering, and forensic infrastructure. These flaws are made worse by the unwillingness and wrongdoing of law enforcement and medical professionals, improper evidence processing, and inadequate victim support systems. This article examines the importance of medico-legal perspective of Forensic Science in determining rape case in India. It discusses the importance of medical professionals opinions and the investigators role, the distinct terms of forensic evidence and medico legal in this context. In this context this article calls for a thorough revamp through multidisciplinary reforms, such as the creation of strong forensic and medical facilities, biennial national seminars, mandated professional training, and inclusive committees. It highlights prompt and trauma-informed medical evaluations, suggests victim-centric reforms, and suggests amending current legislation to make procedural errors illegal.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 5, Page 1338 - 1356
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110855
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021