Home / Volume 7, Issue 3 / Lok Adalats in India: A Comprehensive Analysis of… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 7 Issue 3 3002 - 3015 June 14, 2024

Lok Adalats in India: A Comprehensive Analysis of their Role in Facilitating Speedy Justice

Lead author · Corresponding
Priya Jaiswal
Student at Shambhunath Institute of Law, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.117794
Abstract

This research aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of the Lok Adalats in India, with a specific focus on their role in expediting the delivery of justice. The research primarily focuses on the organizational structure, jurisdiction, and historical evolution along with the legal frameworks of Lok Adalats in India. The study also delves into analyzing the functioning of the Lok Adalats in India and the respective impact of the Lok Adalats over the huge backlog of cases within the Indian Judiciary. This paper humbly attempts to assess the procedural aspects and mechanisms employed by the Lok Adalats in resolving disputes and emphasizing their efficiency in achieving speedy justice. The study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of the Lok Adalats in India as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism and assess their contribution to reducing the expediency of cases in the Indian judicial system. Lok Adalat represents an innovative forum and a much-needed addition to international jurisprudence for dispute resolution. They symbolize an independent, voluntary, disputant-friendly, efficient, justice-oriented, and non-technical platform for the settlement of disputes, in addition to being a recourse from the millions of cases clogging the dockets in courts. It will further scrutinize the variety of cases mostly addressed effectively by the Lok Adalats and identify the forthcoming challenges and limitations that become a hurdle to their efficient functioning. This paper will also explore the general public's perceptions and the stakeholders' opinions regarding Lok Adalats and its work. The Lok Adalat has become a tool for magnifying the legal crisis; not only do they act as tangible reminders of the failure of the formal justice system, but their unabashed acceptance reflects a form of acquiescence to failure and complacency that discourages any substantial reform of the state judicial system.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 3, Page 3002 - 3015
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.117794
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us