Justice Beyond the Veil: Revisiting Brock’s Game Theoretic Account of Social Justice and Its Contemporary Significance
Horace W. Brock’s 1979 essay, “A Game Theoretic Account of Social Justice,” offers a profound reinterpretation of distributive justice by integrating two foundational norms: allocation by need and allocation by contribution. This review re-examines Brock’s work in the context of contemporary ethical and policy challenges. We explore how his bifurcated model, using game-theoretic tools like the Nash Bargaining Solution and the Shapley Value, can be adapted to address modern dilemmas in economic inequality, climate justice, algorithmic decision-making, and participatory governance. By bridging philosophical rigor with mathematical precision, Brock’s theory continues to offer a valuable lens for conceptualizing justice in our globalized, data-driven society.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.