Abstract

The Patents Act, 1970 (as amended in 2005) governs the Indian patent regime, and this judicial analysis explores the complexities of the pre-grant and post-grant patent opposition procedures. This study scrutinizes the grounds for pre-grant opposition and the procedural safeguards in place to prevent frivolous challenges, while also examining the role of the Controller of Patents and the judiciary in adjudicating these disputes. Meanwhile, post-grant opposition permits objections to a patent's validity after it has been issued, usually within a year of the grant. The reasons for post-grant opposition are examined in detail in this analysis, including issues regarding prior art, sufficient disclosure, and deceptive inventor ship claims. The study further examines important judicial precedents that have shaped the interpretation and application of the provisions, highlighting evolving jurisprudence in India. This study provides insight on how to strike a balance between protecting the public interest and safeguarding inventors' rights by examining important cases and the judicial approach of pre- and post-grant opposition. These underscore the importance of a robust opposition system in maintaining the integrity of the patent regime in India, ensuring that the patent system serves as a tool for innovation rather than an instrument for monopolistic practices.

Keywords