Assistant Professor at Government Law College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
Vitriolage, commonly referred to as acid attack, represents one of the most brutal forms of violence, resulting in severe physical disfigurement and long-term socio-economic marginalisation of victims. Among its most devastating consequences is the deprivation of the right to livelihood, which has been recognised as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This article undertakes a comprehensive socio-legal analysis of the impact of acid attacks on the livelihood of victims in India. It examines constitutional jurisprudence, statutory frameworks, judicial interventions, and empirical data to highlight the structural barriers faced by survivors in accessing employment. The study argues that despite progressive judicial recognition and legislative measures, systemic gaps in implementation, social stigma, and inadequate rehabilitation mechanisms continue to undermine the effective realisation of livelihood rights. The article concludes by advocating for a holistic, rights-based approach that integrates legal remedies with socio-economic empowerment measures.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 2, Page 1342 - 1356
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1111632
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021