LL.M. Student at Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
Assistant Professor at Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
A Geographical Indication (GI) tag is a form of intellectual property protection that safeguards the distinct qualities, reputation, and authenticity of products linked to a specific geographical region. It plays an important role in preserving cultural heritage and traditional knowledge associated with such products. Beyond legal protection, GI recognition can serve as a powerful tool by helping create a unique brand identity, enable producers to obtain premium prices, and support the empowerment of local communities. In this sense, GI protection contributes to reinforce the broader Indian economy. The North-eastern States of India are rich in traditional and cultural arts and craft, unique agricultural produce, and natural products. In spite of this enormous potential, the region has comparatively fewer GI registered products compared to the other parts of the country. Only few states, such as Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, and Meghalaya, received GI recognition. Despite the fact that India’s GI registration system has been in place since 2005. This study examines the role of Geographical Indications as a tool for empowering local communities, with special reference to Northeastern India, a region rich in cultural diversity, indigenous skills, and unique agricultural and artisanal products. The paper also analyzes how GI protection contributes to community empowerment by enhancing market recognition, generating employment, and increasing income opportunities. The paper also emphasizes the current disparities between legal recognition and actual benefit delivered to the indigenous producers of Northeastern India. By means of some selected examples of GI-tagged products from Northeastern India, the study explores the practical impact of GI registration while identifying the key challenges face by the local producers such as lack of awareness of the Intellectual Property Rights, inadequate institutional support, limited access to the market, and enforcement issues. The study concludes that although Geographical Indication possess significant potential for community-based development, their accomplishment rely on efficient implementations, involvement of producers, and enabling legislative actions.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 2, Page 288 - 304
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1111528
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021