Home / Volume 7, Issue 5 / Generic Marks, Secondary Meaning and Trademark Bullying in… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 7 Issue 5 815 - 823 September 28, 2024

Generic Marks, Secondary Meaning and Trademark Bullying in India

Lead author · Corresponding
Guru Vignesh M.
Student at Tamil Nadu National Law University, India
Abstract

Generic Marks, which are generally not protected by registration is protected if they acquire a secondary meaning. There are different methods to prove that a ‘generic term’ has attained a secondary meaning. ‘Survey methods’ are usually accepted in courts to establish a prima facie case in this context. When bigger companies register a generic trade mark, they exhibit a tendency to bully smaller companies with legal actions and ultimately force them to settle or rebrand their products in the market. Though false threat of infringement is dealt with under the Indian Trademark laws, the issue of trade mark bullying is not directly addressed. The case of ‘Nandhini Deluxe’ fits the definition of trademark bullying and shows an emerging trend of trademark bullying in India.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 5, Page 815 - 823
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue IV now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us