Generic Marks, Secondary Meaning and Trademark Bullying in India

  • Guru Vignesh M.
  • Show Author Details
  • Guru Vignesh M.

    Student at Tamil Nadu National Law University, India

  • img Download Full Paper

Abstract

Generic Marks, which are generally not protected by registration is protected if they acquire a secondary meaning. There are different methods to prove that a ‘generic term’ has attained a secondary meaning. ‘Survey methods’ are usually accepted in courts to establish a prima facie case in this context. When bigger companies register a generic trade mark, they exhibit a tendency to bully smaller companies with legal actions and ultimately force them to settle or rebrand their products in the market. Though false threat of infringement is dealt with under the Indian Trademark laws, the issue of trade mark bullying is not directly addressed. The case of ‘Nandhini Deluxe’ fits the definition of trademark bullying and shows an emerging trend of trademark bullying in India.

Type

Research Paper

Information

International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 5, Page 815 - 823

DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118317

Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © IJLMH 2021