Abstract

This paper analyses the complex dynamics of electoral delimitation as an essential mechanism for ensuring equitable representation in a democracy, referencing India's changing socio-political and demographic context. Delimitation, based on the democratic concept of "one person, one vote," aims to rectify demographic disparities and provide proportional representation in parliament. This paper examines the historical and constitutional evolution of delimitation in India, emphasising significant milestones such as the suspension of constituency borders by the 42nd and 84th Amendments and its impending expiration in 2026. This paper critically analyses the long-term freeze's effects, focusing on the increasing imbalances in representation among states with varying population growth rates. The research uses empirical approaches such as the Webster method to model future seat redistributions and delineates the political, administrative, and ethical challenges inherent in the delimitation process. The research aims to identify worldwide best practices and problems by drawing on comparative experiences from the United States, United Kingdom, South Africa, and Australia. The study further advocates for reforms focused on transparency, technology convergence, periodic evaluations, and more institutional autonomy. Finally, it argues that without the adoption of a deliberate, inclusive, and constitutionally sound framework, the forthcoming delimitation may worsen regional disparities and undermine India's democratic structure.

Keywords