Abstract

Social media has transformed global communication because most individuals can share their views and contribute to the discussion of issues. However, the ease with which all people share posts on social media has facilitated the spread of hate speech, which incites violence, discrimination, and hostility against vulnerable groups. This paper analyzes the impact of social media on defamation and freedom of expression, raising questions about the rise of social media platforms and the type of function they lend to hate speech. The regulation of hate speech becomes tricky because social media operates across national spaces with varied laws and legal instruments. Although efforts to curtail hate speech on social media are still inadequate, there is still no common regulatory framework for all: whereas some, such as the United States, place the principle of free speech at its core and others, such as the European Union, apply stronger regulation over hate speech. Algorithms on these sites often prefer stimulating and emotionally resonant content and give immense play to inflammatory rhetoric. The paper continues with a contrast between the various legal frameworks used in defamation proceedings across the UK, India, and the US and tensions between free speech and the protection of reputation. It ends with recommendations on how to address hate speech, stressing a more holistic approach that would entail stronger intergovernmental collaboration with technology companies and civil society. The paper is based on a doctrinal methodology of research.

Keywords