Home / Volume 6, Issue 5 / Critical Analysis of the Definition provided under Section… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Volume 6 Issue 5 13 - 18 September 2, 2023

Critical Analysis of the Definition provided under Section 2(1)(h) of the Trademarks Act, 1999

Lead author · Corresponding
Hemalatha G.
Student at SASTRA University, India
Abstract

Section 2(1)(h) of the Trademarks Act defines similarity/resemblance as the degree to which two trademarks resemble each other in terms of their appearance, sound, connotion, or commercial impression. This definition provides a comprehensive understanding of the nature of similarity that needs to be considered when evaluating trademarks for potential infringement. However, the determination of similarity is subjective and can depend upon various factors such as the nature of the goods/services, the degree of consumer confusion, and market perception. Thus, the definition provided under Section 2(1)(h) may not be adequate enough to fully capture the nuances and complexities involved in evaluating trademark similarity. In this article it is discussed whether this definition provided under section 2(1)(h) of the Trademarks Act, 1999 is adequate to understand the nature of similarity or resemblance that needs to be considered is an important one, as it has significant implications for trademark registration and infringement purposes. It is important to understand the nature of similarity or resemblance that needs to be considered when assessing the registrability of a mark.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 5, Page 13 - 18
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us