VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessResearch PaperVol. 8 No. IV (2025)pp. 650–655

Consent, Fabrication, and Proof: The Legal Dilemma of Deepfakes in the Indian Judicial System

AM
Aishwarya MudgadkarStudent at MP Law College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
View PDF
1,083views278downloads
Published 14 July 2025 · pp. 650–655 · Vol. 8 No. IV (2025)
Abstract

The rise of AI-powered deepfakes is becoming a big matter in India. Deepfakes tend to malign reputations, spread misinformation, or sometimes are used for blackmail or fraud. The Indian system is struggling with these new challenges, especially with consent issues, identification of fakes, and reliable proof being an accepted standard in courts. With the new proposed statutes of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), it looks like India is trying to take a stand. This paper explains deepfakes in layperson's language, shows how deepfake technology is being misused, examines new legal provisions, and probes more actions that can be taken to shield humankind from this dangerous technology.

Keywords
DeepfakesConsentFabricationProofBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)CybercrimeDigital EvidenceDefamationIndian LawPrivacy

How to cite

Aishwarya Mudgadkar, Consent, Fabrication, and Proof: The Legal Dilemma of Deepfakes in the Indian Judicial System, 8 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 650 (2025).

Cite this article

Aishwarya Mudgadkar, Consent, Fabrication, and Proof: The Legal Dilemma of Deepfakes in the Indian Judicial System, 8 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 650 (2025).
Chat with us