INTRODUCTION
Conceptualizing community well-being and examination of social, political, and environmental governance conditions affect the rights of vulnerable communities. Changing climatic phenomena addresses the global environment and disrupts the existence of human livelihood1.The continuous rise of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions impacts climate change, which poses a threat to the stability of not only the current generation but also the future of vulnerable and disadvantaged communities2. It’s vital to examine environmental justice from the perspective of development and efficacy in tackling changing climatic conditions. The theoretical concept of environmental concept addresses the equitable distribution of environmental burdens and the effect over communities affected with environmental decisions3. Climate justice approach exposes vulnerability in the society with exposing the changing in climatic and environmental conditions with procedural distribution addressing the climate change over the vulnerable community4.The long-lasting objective of the environmental changes and the effect over vulnerable population groups in India. The environmental crisis in the Himalayan region is attributed with issues concerning social economic factors relating to the environment5.
A “double exposure” can aptly describe climate justice in India, a new pattern of benefit and burden associated with the concept of globalization. This paper examines the existing vulnerabilities and role of India’s judiciary of interpreting Right to Life and Personal Liberty which extensively deals with the socio-economic impacts of climate change and, in particular, focuses on equity and vulnerability. Understanding the adverse effect of climate change and the necessity for social consideration brought into policy adaptation and regulation formulation stages6, presents a thorough analysis of issues concerning climate change in India, which has been through the lens of policy, governance, and developmental aspects. It provides critical knowledge about the challenges of implementing climate policies in a diverse and developing country. Climate change is one of contemporary society’s most simple and understandable phenomena. It truly affects the balance of ecosystems, economic systems, and human communities. The impacts may be distributed all over the globe, but the distribution among those affected is very uneven. Climate justice, thus, specifically within the Indian context, encompasses a range of issues, from equal resource endowment to fair distribution of both burdens and benefits of climate change and the active participation of marginalized peoples in decision-making processes. It calls for affirmation that global warming exacerbates the existing social, economic, and environmental inequalities and points out that any successful intervention must also encompass these inequalities. This paper examines existing policies and legal frameworks and mentions the necessity for inclusive distributive climate justice projects.
This paper lays emphasis on climate vulnerability and Examines India’s Resilience towards Climatic Justice. The applicability of Rawls Distributive Justice in Changing India’s Climatic Justice Perspective. Climatic Crisis and Effect over Right to Life, overlapping effect of International and India’s perspective. The Efficacy of India’s Judicial Pronouncement in mapping the effect of Right to Life and Personal Liberty. The paper further emphasizes towards fortifying the Right of Vulnerable Community Through the lens of India’s Right to Life. Lastly the paper focuses upon Changing India’s Paradigm Towards Climate Justice, an Environmental Perspective.
LITERATURE REVIEW: THEORETICAL UNDERPINNING ON ENVIRONMENTAL JURISPRUDENCE
Climate and environmental justice are not only inclined towards injustice prevalent in the society but also an active creation of a knowledge system that emphasizes the principles of fairness, justice, equality and fortification of human rights. Previous studies reveal that the increase of global greenhouse gas emissions and the effect on India’s global poverty level and the necessity to build resilience against a climatic impact7. This paper reveals widening the scope of Art 21 to include the proviso of climatic justice and resilient action for the fortification of vulnerable community groups. The safeguard of the marginalized community mitigates the effects of climate change and highlights the pre-requisite of just climatic decision and effect on those impacted by the climatic crisis8. The principle of environmental justice and nature and role widely in context of environmental policy with highlighting dimeson of distributive, procedural and restorative justice9. Every human being is inherent recognized across the globe for recognition of their human rights relating with climate change10.Indian Constitution recognizes right to life as the most basic right guaranteed by the state for protecting one’s own personal liberty and right to privacy. Climate change poses a risk to the material aspect, which affects livelihood and accessibility to basic necessities of human beings11. When climate change poses a foreseeable threat that leads to an unnatural interference with the enjoyment of life. The climate crisis requires reparation for environmental damages and building a society for a just world order and recognition, respect of diverse actors and participation in various important aspect exist beyond the theory of distributive justice12. Fulfillment of state needs and one of the important elements of distributive justice, fairness includes rules and reasonableness of equitable distribution of justice in the society. Thereby, this paper emphasizes the principle of Intergenerational Equity, which refers to the just distribution of equality and burden in fortifying the interest of the future generation. Developing a framework that addresses distributive justice by considering the cost and benefit of climate change across populations and generations with corrective reparative justice for individuals suffering from high-level carbon emissions13. This research provides the applicability of Transformative and Reformative action in educating Indian society about the role of climate justice through the ambit of Art 21 resilience. The social structure of understanding climatic change addresses the need to address the systematic inequality prevalent in society’s Mitigating carbon emissions assists the government in formulating its own responsible climate justice framework, including the concept of burden-sharing and harm avoidance measures. None of the previous studies addresses the necessity of enhancing India’s climate framework with the overlapping applicability of Distributive, Climatic, and Environmental Justice (EJ). This paper ascertains the effect of India’s Climatic Context, encompassing equal resource endowment, fair distribution of both burdens and benefits of climate change, with active participation of the marginalized community in decision-making. Lastly the paper examines CBDR-RC with the concept of reparative justice in determining the efficacy of India’s Right to Life Resilience in addressing the adverse effect of GHG with transformative justice.
CLIMATE VULNERABILITY AND EXAMINING INDIA’S RESILIENCE TOWARDS CLIMATIC JUSTICE
Resilience arises from the capacity of community building in addressing the uncertainties of climate change and nation-states’ adoption of an adaptive capacity to effectively deal with the changing conditions of climate. In the global south, environmental justice is an uneven developing process, conceptualizing the concept of justice through the theoretical framework of Rawlsian distributive justice principle. Amartya Sen seminal theory states his contribution towards idea of justice and freedom of individuals to engage in the society. The inequal treatment of India’s vulnerable community often leads to green gentrification and creating an elite class of individuals. The unplanned displacement of poor and marginalized community affects the resilience of vulnerable community livelihood in overcoming injustice in the climate conditions. Unequal treatment occurs when climate change and adaption differentiate with treatment towards the rich and poor category of individuals. Climate compatible development (CCD) articulates in mitigating the harm caused by climatic change while emphasizing opportunities of human development and their resilience towards low greenhouse emission14.
However the implementation of climatic changes essentially addresses the effect over the vulnerable populations and their effect over climate colonist and injustice. Extreme heat, unpredictable flooding increasingly affects the rights of underprivilege community as they have fewer resources in contrast with privilege and developed communities and regions. The theoretical overview of climate justice recognizes the unequal and uneven distribution of burden over India’s vulnerable community and the effect of the environment and precedents over the future of the country’s climatic justice. Expanding thee scope of Climatic Resilient Cities through assessing vulnerability of marginalized community and incorporate robust methods for integrating potential output of climatic resources with action planning of India’s nation state. The incremental rise of global emissions beyond 0.8°C will account for 5% of India’s Gross Domestic Product(GDP) loss15.
Further, the exceeding of emission levels beyond 2°C in climate-vulnerable states of Assam, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh amounts to 10% of gross state domestic product(GSDP) loss. India, as an emerging economy, has the largest source of GHG emissions, the country states that advanced nations should follow the principle of CBDR for bearing the emission burden for developing and Least Developed Nations (LDC)16. The report of Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) highlights that 80% of Indian people live in district which are frequently impacted by extreme weather and changing climatic conditions. India’s government and the World Bank(WB) are primarily responsible for assisting farmers to diversify their crop production and understand the know-how of agriculture with use of digital technology. Thereby this paper state the necessary of government intervention for safeguarding the right of vulnerable community against changing climatic conditions and building resilience with applicability of Right to Life.
THE APPLICABILITY OF RAWLS DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE IN CHANGING INDIA’S CLIMATIC JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE
Governments of various countries have invested in abundant resources which are intertwined with climate events prevalent in society. However, there exists an unequal performance of climate change amongst the developing and developed countries and regions, which makes it difficult to allocate climate responsibilities. John Rawls Theory states that good is distributed freely amongst the society, or else there will be an unequal distribution in the society. Each individual present in the society has the right to enjoy freedom and address John Rawls second principle of economic inequalities that are prevalent in the society. Fulfillment of state needs and one of the important elements of distributive justice, fairness includes rules and reasonableness of equitable distribution of justice in the society.
The principle of environmental justice and nature and role widely in context of environmental policy. The common but differentiated responsibility(CBDR) recognizes the environment’s common goal and various countries’ actions to achieve the goal. The advocating of the Polluter Pays Principle, utilizing the conceptual analysis of the polluter pays principle in bearing the expenses of carrying out the cost of polluting the environment on the public. Thereby, this paper emphasizes the principle of Intergenerational Equity, which refers to the just distribution of equality and burden in fortifying the interest of the future generation.
Theories of Intergenerational justice articulate the obligation for past, present, and future generations for environmental reparative action. Trust enables individuals to undertake things together when trust is eroded through betrayal, corruption or wrong doing. This paper analyzes the attribution of the precautionary principle, stating that action or policy causes irresistible harm to the environment. Rawl theory of justice and the concept of distributive justice, different principles take into account various circumstances in implementing laws in the society. Rawls argues that different principles form the basic structure of the society, in regulating all further agreement in specifying the social and environmental cooperation
The issue of climate justice gradually receive international attention, In 2015 the United Nation Climate Change Conference(UNFCCC) even with regard to climate justice and the evolving conceptual analysis of environmental justice which focused on area’s concerning human actions in correlation with disadvantaged ethnic groups17. The impact of poverty over the community reduces nations states resistance thereby increasing their vulnerable impact of the nation-states over the environment. This study emphasizes the applicability of carbon emission and the impact which India’s Right to privacy will have over the vulnerable communities thereby increasing their resilience towards environmental inequality. The principle of CBDR-RC is a fundamental principle under the CoP29 Convention and the Paris Agreement. India’s intervention of the Just Transition Work program in UN Climate Change in Baku highlights the country’s ambition to just transition with unilateral coercive measures, carbon debt principle, and promoting a sustainable lifestyle for the future of the country’s sustainable applicability. Mitigating carbon emissions assists the government in formulating its own responsible climate justice framework, including the concept of burden sharing and harm avoidance measures18. Every human being is inherent recognized across the globe for recognition of their human rights relating with climate change19. Indian Constitution recognizes right to life as the most basic right guaranteed by the state for protecting one’s own personal liberty and right to privacy. The interpretation of India’s constitution represents the country’s philosophy and ideals that promise the Preamble to secure all the citizens, Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, envisioning a fair distribution of wealth and equality. Global climate action involves collaboration and resilience to sustain a reparative approach of intergenerational justice sustenance.
The efficacy of CBDR on India’s Societal Development with Right to Privacy
India emphasizes that all countries should have equitable access to global carbon budget, thereby highlighting the fundamental principal of common but different responsibilities(CBDR) principle. India at COP 27 highlights that developing countries should take responsibility towards the concept of climatic justice with a rapid reduction of existing carbon emissions. India is party to UNFCCC, the report of the country’s National Communication(NC) and Biennial Update Report (BUR) addressing domestic measurement, reporting, and verification(MRV). The principle of CBRD-RC plays an instrumental role in assessing, identifying parties that should contribute to supporting and assisting underdeveloped/developing countries, especially in correlation with the loss/damages suffered due to changing climate conditions. Climate change emerges as a serious threat to the future of human survival, thereby necessitating the nation states across the globe to emphasize the principle of CBDR-RC. States are obliged to take concrete steps in ensuring that the global temperature is limited to 2°C and strive to further limit the temperature beyond 1.5°C in coherence with the Paris Agreement.
Through the bottom-up principles, member states of the convention determine their own National Determined Contribution(NDC) and the applicability of policies to mitigate carbon emissions through CBDR-RC. A marked deviation from the Kyoto Protocol top-down approach, where binding precedents for carbon emission are pre-decided, essentially mitigating developing and Least Developed Nations(LDCs) to understand the realistic goal of climate change. Article 2(2) of the Paris Agreement states that the agreement is to reflect the principle of equity, CBDR in respect of different NDCs. This paper highlights the applicability of India’s government initiatives for preventing, controlling, and managing pollution and the systematic use of resources, enhancing climate justice for vulnerable communities, with the revision of emission standards for the country’s sustainable future.
The principle is fundamental to the concept of international environmental law in addressing the challenges of countries’ implementation and effect on climate change amongst different jurisdictions across the globe20. India at COP27 highlights the foundational principles of CBDR-RC, emphasizing that all nation-states should have access to the global carbon budget, finite resources for adherence to the limits set by the Paris Agreement, and address the imbalances of Kyoto Protocol. India’s commitment towards the Mitigation of climate change is evident through the Conference of the Parties(CoP) 29 for climate Finance, ensuring the commitment of Developed Nations with unilateral measures for mitigating climate change. Highlighting the Mutual Trust to realize countries’ objectivity towards Sustainable Development Goals 2030. In 2030, total global emission estimates are around 2.6% lower than in 2019.
CLIMATE CRISIS AND THE EFFECT OVER RIGHT TO LIFE: OVERLAPPING EFFECT OF INTERNATIONAL AND INDIA’S PERSPECTIVE
The seeds of understanding climate crisis is sown during thee Western colonial period and further transitioning into the industrial revolution, emphasizing fortification of human being in the society. The study of international legislation and convention such as United Nation Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 provides for a framework for member-states in the absence of existence provision in emphasizing on healthy environment. Various Legislation play a crucial role commencing from the Stockholm Declaration on Human Rights towards the top-bottom approach of the Kyoto protocol addressed towards developed countries.
The Changing paradigm of Paris Convention, 2015 recognizes the human rights explicitly contained in the resolution. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR) mentions the serious threat of environmental degradation over the present and future generation in pursuit of enjoyment of right to life. IPCC provides for the process of adjustment of actual and expected changes brought to the climate. Adaption implies policy which the government undertakes to anticipate the change in climate change. Thereby this paper reveals the essential aspect of justice and adaption to climate change and advocating sustainable development. The general applicability of the general rules of the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties(VCLT) seek to interpret treaty laws which is customary binding on all states and the overview of the general principles of systematic integration. Climate change posses a risk to material aspect which affects livelihood and accessibility to basic necessitates of human being21.
When climate change poses a foreseeable threat which leads to an unnatural interference with enjoyment of life. People vulnerability to climate change which is linked with the continuing pattern of gender, ethnicity and colonialism. Climate resilience is not equally distributed across the world and effects vulnerable and marginalized community. Children living in vulnerable to climate change and high risk of human right violation and only 42% of National Determined Contribution addressed to the children or youth situation. With urgency to mitigate the impact of climate change young people recognize the imminent action advocating human right through heath, climate activists. Recognition least climate resilient population and affect of population group across the globe and holistic understanding in safeguarding human right across the globe. This paper necessitates fortifying the right of Vulnerable and marginalized community from India’s perspective through the applicability of Article 21 India’s Constitution. The global climate change adversely affects the rights of fortification of human being health and welfare.
Right to life is an essential component of Right to Health. The Vulnerable community suffer immensely changing climatic conditions. Indigenous community welfare is intertwined with the natural environment and suffers from a lack of well-being and the consequences of disproportionate climate change. India’s constitution, through its court hierarchy structure, attempts to safeguard the rights of the vulnerable and marginalized community through the applicability of the golden triangle (Art 14, 19, and 21). People susceptible to climate change belong to the poor, marginalized community, and workers are exposed to stringent and inhumane conditions. Countries that have disproportionate create an environmental crisis and the applicability of compensation for damages suffered to the aggrieved party through reparations, a redressal mechanism to address the wrongdoing of the party causing injury to another. The concept of Reparatory justice emphasizes acceptance of responsibility and the underlying measure in addressing the injustice and mitigating societal harm22.
CLIMATE REPARATIONS: NECESSITY FOR INDIA’S VULNERABLE COMMUNITY FORTIFICATION
Human rights require states to cooperate with each other with the objective of promoting human rights and welfare, which includes climate finances for an inability of an individual/group or community to afford the basic amenities in addressing climate change and reparation. There exist a necessity to restore justice for wrongdoing and compensators justice aims to retributive justice involving the restoration of people confidence, trust, and aspiration with effective reliability of enforcing individual’s moral belief and values23. Moreover, 80 % of India’s people live in districts that are at risk of climatic changes, such as the rise of temperature changes, rainfall patterns, and groundwater levels, and address the rise of sea levels for livelihood. Inda’s Vulnerable and marginalized population is adversely impacted with the catastrophic impact of climate change. In India environmental changes ranges from severe degradation of environmental amenities which include clean water, sanitation measures for bare human rights existence, and pollution from hazard waster which affects the rights of consumerism. Reparation is generally understood as an effort to redress the significance of societal harm by acknowledging wrongdoing with monetary and reparative means.
The conceptual analysis of Reparative justice includes accepting responsibility through undertaking measures to address societal justice and widespread harm with effective climatic change regulations. When applied to climatic justice, reparations involve identifying both countries and private entities in determining the adverse effect of greenhouse gas(GHG) emissions, contributing to changing climatic conditions. This paper addresses the changing climatic condition of India’s vulnerable communities with effective applicability of reparative justice on fortification of community future with Art 21 resilience mechanism. Climate justice and reparation are based on the principle of justice and fairness. When a when a party has undertaken an advantage priorly by imposing an unfair cost on another without their consent and thereby entailing that party into a disadvantageous position24. The offending party shall shoulder or bear at least to the extent of unfair advantage to restore societal equality.
Countries that have benefited from industrialization and enjoy the highest income should bear the burden of financial reparation from low-income countries. Shue’s second principle states that certain parties have a greater ability to pay, and the parties with greater resources should contribute towards the rights of low-income countries. Shue’s third principle serves the purpose of avoiding making those already even worse than their prior position and instead fostering a radical demand for fairness and decent human living conditions with equity. Distributive justice is superior in sorting through historical claims of injustice to determine the reparation owed to individuals or groups displaced through climate change. Diversity is diverse and includes people from various experiences, expertise, and various cognitive beliefs and values. The principles established in Earth Summit, 1991 interwind both environmental and climatic destruction with issue of historical justice. Environmental justice protects the rights of Environmental Justice(EJ) victims and receives full compensation for reparation of damages (Principles of Environmental Justice 1991). The climate crisis requires reparation for environmental damages and building a society for a just world order.
THE EFFICACY INDIA’S JUDICIAL PRONOUNCEMENT IN MAPPING THE EFFECT OF RIGHT TO LIFE AND PERSONAL LIBERTY
India’s judiciary, through a series of landmark cases, has been illuminating in formulating an interpretation and expansion of constitutional provisions-most notably Article 21, which encompasses Right to Life. In the absence of an appropriate Environment legislation in demarcating the extent of right to clean healthy environment, India’s court interpretation of Right to life to include a proviso of right to healthy environment and enjoyment of basic rights even without actual recognition of environmental right fortification. Right to life is broadly constituted to include environmental protection, despite the countries having the existence of other legislation for addressing environmental change.
The Indian courts frequently analyses and widen the definition clause of Art 21 to include the includes right to healthy environment specifically addressing clean air, water and sanitation. Similarly in the case of Subhash Kumar v State of Bihar’s25 India’s SC held that right to life includes the right to access unpolluted water. The expansion of the court’s definition in Kirolskar Bros Ltd v ESI Corporation26, to encompass the concept of right to livelihood to include a clean and conductive working environment with improving the standard of living. In Murli S Deora v Union of India27, the SC held that smoking in public is violative of right to life as right to life includes the right to healthy life which is free from encumbrances which is detrimental to individuals health. An individual right to life is also violated when the state neglects to address issues concerning environmental degradation and human right abuse, In India Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India28, the Supreme Court held that governments failure to regulate and control hazardous emission constitutes violation of right to life and climate change which drives migration and addresses displacement in the society, laying emphasize on the aspect of vulnerable community for securing life sustaining resources. While migration is the last resort inevitable living conditions state the adaptiveness of human beings through social, economic and health benefit for marginalized community. Trapped population lack the options of relocating from the area which is life threatening and address the issues governing environmental degradation.
Climate change is a global phenomena and pre-requisite in addressing India’s Right to Life and Personal Liberty in the conceptual understanding of reducing global inequalities and ensuring fortification of human rights. The Global Charter for Public Health stipulates health regulation in response with adverse effect towards changing climatic conditions. Thereby advocating the theoretical applicability of Climate Justice. The rights and fairness of procedure justice correlate with fairness of proceeding and adaption in decision process. Recognizing justice refers to to equal legitimization of justice towards racial, ethnic, gender, culture and social identification of individual in adaptation procedure29. Thereby this paper reveals the impact of Climate justice over the resilience of vulnerable community. This paper states that educating the Indian society about the role of climate justice through the ambit of Art 21 provides for India to obtain their goal of reduction of Net Zero emission 2045 and mitigating carbon in 2070. The Supreme Court held that governmental authorities should not create environmental pollution. This article states that this judgment emphasized the working model of states’ and non-state actors’ liability toward the environment.
The study examines and analyses The SC judgment of the Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India,1996) highlighting remedial measures for restoring the adversely affected ecology. The above declarations of the judiciary together form a holistic legal regime that relieves environmental problems and, by extension, climate justice problems in India. In this sense, it reflects the courts’ capabilities and willingness to interpret constitutional provisions broadly to protect environmental rights and bring accountability to various groups of people. More importantly, despite these rulings setting much-needed precepts, more pronounced engagement with climate change issues is still sought within judicial pronouncements. This aims to develop more precise directive authority for incorporating considerations on climate change into environmental structures in judicial decisions and strengthen frameworks for the observation and compliance with climate-related judicial mandates to improve the causes of public interest litigations (P.I.L.s) targeted at climate issues. As the numbers and intensity of climate change consequences rise, Indian courts are more likely to play a pivotal role in safeguarding the rights of vulnerable groups and fostering equitable action under the climate change paradigm. Successive judgments that attempt to grapple with the intricately interlocking links between climate change and justice may effectively outline the contours of climate justice in India.
FORTIFYING THE RIGHT OF VULNERABLE COMMUNITY THROUGH THE LENS OF INDIA’S RIGHT TO LIFE
The Indian judiciary resorts to human rights jurisprudence which lays emphasizes on the basic human rights ranging from right to life and personal liberty contained in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, 1950. India’s court in Maneka Gandhi v Union of India30 held that human being should live with human dignity and court undertake an affirmative step of guarantor of fundamental rights. Thereby this paper reveals the Courts interpretation of the Constitution to direct the state to comply with free legal aid and assist vulnerable community in developing a resilience against the Changing India’s Climate Justice. The Kyoto protocol states that developed countries are required to reach a threshold of mitigation of green house gas(GHG) to allows developing economies to reduce emission to mitigate effect of GHG. The Paris Agreement is more flexible than the Kyoto protocol as Paris goal stipulates reduction of GHG emission from 2°C to 1.5°C and companies to reach SDG 2030 and have Net Zero Emission in Carbon via 2050. Addressing Climate change assist in regulating the effect of vulnerable communities and universally provide for transitioning towards green energy a mark deviation from Fossil Fuel.
The principle of climate reparation is justified with principles of distributive justice, fairness. Shue principles states that when a party has taken unfair advantage of imposing cost over another, the disadvantaged community is permitted to demand that the offending party provides advantage to a vulnerable community to restore equality. Vulnerability in the societal climatic change exist with lack of protection against risk which is linked to climate change. The vulnerabilities among communities, marginalized group of people suffering from poverty. Energy poverty makes it difficult for poor families to cope with increment in energy prices. Thereby its essential for the state to advocate a smooth transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy with concession to people from the vulnerable community affected from climate change. Distributive inequalities of economic system state the entire region and local jurisdiction and provide amenities in addressing aftermath of natural disaster and environment security concern. Another important dimension of climate justice refers to a group of individuals affected by climate change. This paper studies the adaption and effect of climate change in reducing GHGs adaption and vulnerability to consequences of climate change and principle which refers to the socio-economical system and understanding the effect of climate justice. This paper reveals that India increases their index through the applicability of the right to life and laying specific attention towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and Climate Justice.
THE APPLICABILITY OF A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT: A FACET OF RIGHT TO LIFE
Ecocentrism postulates that human beings are ethically bound to conserve non-human species and ensure the equitable utilization of environmental resources. The Stockholm Declaration emphasizes the fortification of the environment with the necessity of sustainable ideology. The ICCPR states that human being has the right to life and safeguard an individual from causation of physical death. The concept of Right to Life is restricted to physical deprivation of human life, however the the emergence of the tragic loss caused to human life in Bhopal gas tragedy led India to broaden its definition of right to life31. The state must safeguard the environment from human degradation and also hold non-state actors absolutely liable for causing wrongful loss and injury to the future of environment sustainability. This paper examines that after the period of United Nation Development Program (UNDP), Paris Deceleration which states that nation states reduce their GHG emission. The report from the World Justice Project states that India’s Fundamental Rights Index plummeted from 0.54 in 2015 to 0.42 in 2023, an overall fall of 22.22%. This paper lays emphasize towards interpreting right to life and focusing upon fortification of vulnerable communities resilience in addressing the future of procedural and distributive justice in climate change. Thereby understanding the working framework of Climate Justice and encompasses SDG Principle 2 of Leave No One Behind(LNOAB) for nation states to obtain their goal of SDG 2030, reduction of carbon emission from 2°C to 1.5 °C (Yilmaz, N., 2007). The understanding of domestic and international legislation and broadening the court’s interpretation of right to life to lay emphasis towards Climate justice and evolve with principle of Rawls distributive justice, procedural and recognition principle of justice. The UNFCCC highlights the state obligation in addressing climatic change and effect over civil society, environmentalist group and labor community in advocating climate change.
The study of Alexandra Phelan reveals that framing climate change and social lens concerning human rights is instrumental to mitigate global threat and fortify human rights. Thereby this paper highlights right to life and the diverse action over the climate and addressing the climate crisis from India’s Article 21 perspective. On violation of fundamental rights, India citizens have the right to enforce writ petition for enforcement their rights of environment fortification and protect the right of vulnerable group. This paper emphasizes India’s constitutional provision and active progression in environment fortification. The developing of India’s theoretical analysis of right to life lays was laid by India’s Supreme Court in Munn V Illionos, wherein the court held that life means something more than an animal existence and not deprive an individual from rights which they could have enjoyed.
The starting point of India’s judiciary towards climatic change and interpretation of Article 21 is undertaken in Maneka Gandhi case. The court provides for a wider interpretation of Article 21 which includes individual right to healthy environment. Further widening the scope of Art 21 to include proviso of climatic justice and resilient action for fortification of vulnerable community groups. Social justice is multidimensional in recognizing rights of every human being in striving to create a system of equitable justice and distribution of resources in the society. The absence of cosmopolitan model articulates the necessity to formulate a uniform legislation to advocate global justice. The lens of climate change and framing of justice-based approach to improve the legitimacy of international climatic finance and promoting of responsible and collective action for addressing changing climate Wealthier nations have an obligation towards acting poor nation in adapting to climate change.
CHANGING INDIA’S PARADIGM TOWARDS CLIMATE JUSTICE: AN ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE
Justice is about fairness and laying emphasis on the distribution of benefits and burdens contained in this globe. Environmental justice is understood as a conceptual analysis of distributing environmental benefits and fairness concerning environmental burden adversely affecting human being rights. This paper addresses the applicability of changing India’s policies and facilitating the broadening of Article 21 to include the proviso of resilient and vulnerable communities in environmental fortification and promoting a sustainable ecosystem.
The applicability of procedural justice provides for fair, equitable justice in addressing the equal voice of the vulnerable communities in society and establishing resilience to climate change, with the aspect of the Right to Life. The development of Environmental Justice(EJ) by Robert Bullard examines the efficacy of marginalized communities and the disproportionate effect of environmental degradation due to unequal laws and policies. The principle of climate justice extends to the global and international level, addressing the impact of marginalized community and their effect on future generations. To achieve climate justice, the impact over the GHG effect should be addressed with social justice and address the issue of vulnerable community.
This paper states India’s Right to Life as an effective Fundamental Rights in courts interpreting the nation’s perspective of procedural and distributive justice thereby enhancing the resilience of vulnerable communities. Addressing climate change with the transformative justice in laying emphasize towards transformative justice in formulating long-term sustainability and bring about structural changes in nations ability of complying with Sustainable Development Goals. Thereby revealing Caney proposition that the ethical dimension is a pivotal aspect of climate justice. The Polluter pay principle determines the extent of the adaption for policymakers to engage in the principle of fairness and justice.
Lastly, this paper observes the situation of 2050, where it expected European states and Germany to reach their goal of Net Zero Emissions 2050 and 2045, respectively. This paper states that India will obtain its Net Zero Emission with the process of building the resilience of the vulnerable communities, and the applicability of CBDR in widening India’s proviso clause of Art 21. Perception of energy saving attitude with CRE project with their environmental problem to consider any individual and community action. Local community promote their own development and getting involved into determining their vulnerable community initiative to embrace exploitation of natural resources and sustainability orientation.
Suggestive Measures
This paper provides for focus on Art 21 with addition of proviso clause emphasizing the applicability of LNOAB principle. Utilizing procedural model of justice in understanding transition from fossil fuels towards green energy and assist India in obtaining Net Zero Emission 2070. Broader application of Art 21 fortifies human right of vulnerable community thereby building a resilience addressing changing climate condition and mitigation of GHG in the future of India’s Climate Justice Framework. This paper ultimately focuses on formulating India’s distributive, procedural and framing a climate justice with the focus centric towards Right to Life.
The study addresses broader focus on Art 21, Right to Life to include proviso of advocating SDG Principle 2 of Leave No One Behind (LNOAB). Climate justice encompasses the equitable allocation of climate resources addressed towards the vulnerable community. Emphasizing on the principle of just climatic action and systematic transformation change with understanding the right of vulnerable and marginalized community is instrumental to address changing climatic conditions and safeguarding India’s constitutional rights.
Furthermore, promoting transparency in fostering climate change and obtaining India’s reduction of carbon emission from 2°C to 1.5°C, laying objectivity for the nation-state to achieve Net Zero Emission 2070. India’s climatic policies are erratic, inequitable and disproportionate amongst certain section, urban, middle and upper class and corporate bodies. These policies discriminate and exclude marginalized community especially in framing climate regulations. This paper lays specific attention towards Art 21, climate change and adaption with the aspect of procedural and distributive justice of fairness is fortifying rights of vulnerable community. Re-examining and reforming policies to understand the right of undervalued and indigenous community in the decision making, policy framing process should be revisited and incorporated.
Thereby focusing on Right to Healthy Environment, SDG Goals, the aspect of judicial interpretation and widening the definition of Art 21 to include aspect of Community Renewable Energy (CRE) in understanding the procedure of reduction of emission in the society. Addressing the right of vulnerable community in leading towards a resilient climate change of Net Zero Emission 2070.
CONCLUSION
This paper emphasizes the ability of conceptualizing community well being of vulnerable community and examines the effect of India‘s Art 21 over climate change. Addressing the inequality present in the society through the applicability of theoretical study of distributive study of Rawl, examining transformative and environment change. The model proposes broadening the definition of India’s Climate Framework not only inclined towards existing environmental legislation but also examine the efficacy of Art 21 in understanding the concept of Right to Life and Personal Liberty. Addressing issue of Environmental Health, SDG 2030 and the effect of judicial pronouncement in fortifying the future of India’s Climate resilience. Understanding the effect of fairness justice and equality contained in India’s constitution with Rawls Distributive Model and study of Robert Bullard Environment Model. CBDR Principle recognizes the goal of the environment and actions of various countries in mitigating greenhouse gas(GHG) emission and polluter shall pay for causing injury to the environment and effect over climate degradation. This paper analyses the effect of vulnerable community and analyses the efficacy of India’s novel climate model through ambit of Art 21 resilience. The courts and judicial pronouncement with a broader interpretation to the scope of Art 21 with climate justice framework.
This paper provides for educating the Indian masses for the country to reach bottom-down app-roach of reduction of carbon emission 2045 and obtain carbon mitigation of 2070, through transformative justice. India’s Novel Climate Justice Framework in addressing the right of vulnerable community through the ambit of Art 21 resistant applicability. Wealthier nations have an obligation towards poor nation in development of adaptation to climate change. The transition from fossil fuel towards green energy fortifies the long-term interest of vulnerable communities with the principle of a holistic understanding of green energy and mitigates the effect of non-renewable sources. Community engagement and renewable energy for capable of addressing varying level of energy. The effect of social norms in engaging with sustainable community to exert powerful influence of behavioral attention
*****
Footnotes
1. Steffen, W. et al., Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene, 115 Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 8252, 8252–59 (2018).
2. Anderson, A., Climate Change Education for Mitigation and Adaptation, 6 J. Educ. for Sustainable Dev. 191, 191–206 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408212475199.
3. Agyeman, Julian, Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice (N.Y. Univ. Press 2005).
4. Schlosberg, David & Lisette B. Collins, From Environmental to Climate Justice: Climate Change and the Discourse of Environmental Justice, 5 WIREs Climate Change 359, 359–74 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.275.
5. Jodha, Narpat S., Mountain Perspectives and Sustainability: A Framework for Development Strategies (Tata Energy Research Inst. 1992).
6. Dubash, Navroz K. ed., Handbook of Climate Change and India: Development, Politics and Governance (Cambridge Univ. Press 2012).
7. id
8. Newell, Peter, Mind the Gap: The Global Governance of Just Transitions (Cambridge Univ. Press 2021).
9. McCauley, Lauren & Raphael Heffron, Dimensions of Justice in Environmental Policy, 13 Env’t Just. 179, 179–89 (2020).
10. Risteski, Tome, Elizabeta Todorova, Sašo Džafče & Aleksandra Gligorova, The Right to a Healthy Climate as a Function of the Right to Life, 1 J. Econ. Dev., Env’t & People 27, 27–38 (2012).
11. Adger, W. Neil et al. eds., Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change (MIT Press 2006).
12. Táíwò, Olúfẹ́mi O., The Fight for Reparations Cannot Ignore Climate Change, Boston Rev. (Jan. 2022), https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-fight-for-reparations-cannot-ignore-climate-change
13. Caney, Simon, Justice and the Distribution of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 5 J. Global Ethics 125, 125–46 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1080/17449620903110300.
14. Mitchell, Tom & Simon Maxwell, Defining Climate Compatible Development, 2 Climate & Dev. 1, 1–7 (2010), https://doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2009.0041
15. Nandi, Jairaj, Climate Risk: 9 Indian States Among Top Vulnerable Places in the World, Hindustan Times (Feb. 21, 2023), https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/9-indian-states-among-top-vulnerable-places-101676922251068.html.
16. Supra Note. 9.
17. Pettit, Jethro, Climate Justice: A New Social Movement for Atmospheric Rights, 35 IDS Bull. 102, 102–07 (2004), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00142.x.
18. Supra Note.18
19. Supra Note.13
20. Romdhane, Meriem, What Is the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC) Principle?, ClimaTalk (July 12, 2021), https://climatalk.org/2021/07/12/what-is-the-cbdr-rc-principle/
21. Supra Note.14
22. Chapman, Audrey R., Climate Change, Human Rights, and Health Equity, 22 Global Health J. 101, 101–12 (2022).
23. Walker, Margaret Urban, What Is Reparative Justice? (Marquette Univ. Press 2010).
24. Shue, Henry, Global Environment and International Inequality, 75 Int’l Aff. 531, 531–45 (1999).
25. Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, (1991) 1 S.C.C. 598 (India).
26. Kirloskar Bros. Ltd. v. ESI Corp., (1996) 2 S.C.C. 682 (India).
27. Murli S. Deora v. Union of India, (2001) 8 S.C.C. 765 (India).
28. Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, (1996) 3 S.C.C. 212 (India).
29. Fraser, Nancy, Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World, 36 New Left Rev. 69, 69–88 (2005).
30. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 S.C.C. 248 (India).
31. Jawcett, James, Human Rights—A New Ideology, 8 Int’l Rel. 494, 494–510 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1177/004711788600800505