Student at Jindal Global Law School, India
This commentary critically examines the Supreme Court’s decision in ‘Workmen of Nilgiri Cooperative Marketing Society Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu’, which applied the control and integration tests mechanically and thereby denied contract workers in a cooperative society protection under labor law. In giving primacy to formal contractual relationships over economic dependency, the Court did not promote substantive justice to vulnerable workers. This decision continues to reinforce structural inequalities and erodes the protective goals of labor law, especially in India’s large informal sector. This paper argues that the decision is a sign of a glaring flaw in reasoning and begs the cause for a jurisprudential shift towards the recognition of de facto employment relationships. Based on principles embedded in the Indian Constitution and international labor standards, it appeals for the development of a more inclusive and pragmatic legal framework that guarantees the rights of economically dependent workers in all sectors.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 3, Page 1028 - 1032
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.119766This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021