Student at Symbiosis Law School, Pune, India
The case comment discusses the judgement given in the case of Hari Shankar v. Rao Girdhari Lal Chowdhury and further analyses Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure mainly stating about the inaccuracy in the High Court’s revision and also deliberates upon which powers are conferred upon the Court under revisionary jurisdiction by evaluating the Supreme Court's decision in the present case. Moreover, the piece recognises the latest position of law by examining Law Commission’s Reports. Lastly, the case comment provides suggestions in regard to the provision of revision for the betterment and efficient functioning of the judicial system.
Case Comment
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 4, Issue 4, Page 2275 - 2278
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.111575This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021