VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessResearch PaperVol. 5 No. III (2022)pp. 391–394

Case Analysis: Jayamma & Anrs v State of Karnataka

R
RuchiStudent at Himachal Pradesh University, India.
View PDF
3,889views1,299downloads
Published 18 May 2022 · pp. 391–394 · Vol. 5 No. III (2022)
Abstract

The Supreme Court in May 2021, delivered a judgement. The main point of consideration was, whether a dying declaration can be considered as a sole and non questionable evidence in a case. This case analysis give a complete outlook of the case and further explains the reasoning given by the Supreme Court over evidentiary value and circumstantial importance of dying declaration

Keywords
EvidenceDying Declaration

How to cite

Ruchi, Case Analysis: Jayamma & Anrs v State of Karnataka, 5 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 391 (2022).

Cite this article

Ruchi, Case Analysis: Jayamma & Anrs v State of Karnataka, 5 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 391 (2022).
Chat with us