Home / Volume 5, Issue 3 / Case Analysis: Jayamma & Anrs v State of… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 5 Issue 3 391 - 394 May 18, 2022

Case Analysis: Jayamma & Anrs v State of Karnataka

Lead author · Corresponding
Ruchi
Student at Himachal Pradesh University, India.
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.113102
Abstract

The Supreme Court in May 2021, delivered a judgement. The main point of consideration was, whether a dying declaration can be considered as a sole and non questionable evidence in a case. This case analysis give a complete outlook of the case and further explains the reasoning given by the Supreme Court over evidentiary value and circumstantial importance of dying declaration

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 5, Issue 3, Page 391 - 394
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.113102
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us